Blog

The best Android and iPhone gimbal

[ad_1]

Why you should trust us

I am a lifelong photography enthusiast and journalist who has spent the last five years writing about emerging camera technology such as drones, 360-degree cameras, and light field cameras. I’ve spent hundreds of hours flying drones and seen the benefits a gimbal can provide for stabilizing footage.

Who should get this

Smartphones that shoot 4K video are now common enough that even amateur videographers can shoot high-quality videos. A gimbal—a pivoting suspension device that mechanically stabilizes a camera—can replace an expensive tripod or dolly to make cinematic video effects accessible to anyone. Primarily, gimbals smooth out hand tremors or a bumpy gait if you are filming while walking. They can also make pans look smooth and consistent, or automate tricky shots like time lapses. Additionally, they can serve as souped-up selfie sticks that allow you to hold a phone farther away from your face for better framing.

Gimbals are made up of two parts: On the bottom is a handle, which you hold much like a selfie stick. The handle usually includes a mix of buttons, joysticks, and wheels. The gimbal sits on top of the handle, and looks like an arm with a gripper that holds your phone. When you wiggle the handle, the phone stays in place.

If you like filming video with your existing smartphone and are comfortable spending a little more than $100 to achieve more professional-looking results, a gimbal might be right for you. It’s a nice tool for filming scenery on vacation, or something to bring along for an active hobby like snowboarding. The ability to film yourself also makes them useful for social media and live streaming.

Though a gimbal for a smartphone is likely to be less expensive, gimbals are available for nearly every type of camera, including DSLRs and GoPros. If you use a different type of camera more than your phone, consider investing in a gimbal for that camera instead.

We do not cover cameras with built-in gimbals or models that approximate gimbal performance digitally in this guide, but they’re also worth considering. We like the Insta360 One, which we recommend in our guide to 360-degree cameras. It lets you shoot spherical videos that you can edit into shake-free regular videos, complete with gimbal-like pans. Additionally, DJI, which makes our top smartphone-gimbal pick, offers the Osmo Pocket camera, which integrates a similar gimbal. They cost a bit more, but could be a good option for someone who doesn’t have a high-quality camera in their smartphone or wants something they can pull out of their pocket and start using. They can also be a better option if you don’t want to risk damaging your $1,000 smartphone while filming.

How we picked

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

The DJI Osmo Mobile 2 (top) has just a few buttons, while the Zhiyun Smooth 4 (bottom) has many. Both approaches work, but we liked that we had to touch the phone screen less often while using the Smooth 4. Photo: Signe Brewster

We read Amazon and B&H reviews to find the most popular smartphone gimbals currently available. We also watched YouTube reviews and footage shot with different gimbals to find promising options. With what we learned, plus our own habits, in mind, we determined the following features are most important:

  • A three-axis gimbal: A three-axis gimbal provides superior stabilization to a two-axis gimbal by using accelerometers and gyroscopes to keep an attached phone steady. We skipped testing stabilizers that do not have a true three-axis gimbal.
  • Autonomous modes: Preprogrammed shooting modes make getting some types of shots, including time lapses and dolly zooms, dead simple. Many gimbals can also autonomously track a moving subject.
  • Great customer service: Reaching a customer service representative and receiving a response should be easy; the faster the better.
  • A warranty: Manufacturers should be willing to repair or replace gimbals that develop issues outside the owner’s control. A year-long warranty is standard.
  • Easy to set up: An instruction booklet or link to a video that shows how to set up and operate the gimbal is essential, as every gimbal operates differently. If the gimbal needs to be adjusted so the phone balances correctly, it should take just one or two steps. The gimbal, phone, and app should all connect to one another without much fuss.
  • Wide phone compatibility: Companies usually list a range of phone sizes and weights that work with their gimbal. We looked for options that can work with a wide selection of phones, but especially our top iPhone and Android picks.
  • A great app: The best apps are easy to use thanks to clear design and come with lots of options for customizing camera settings. The app should be available for both iOS and Android devices.
  • Easy-to-use buttons: Whether you prefer more or fewer buttons on a gimbal’s handle, the buttons should each have a clear purpose and be relatively easy to learn and use. However, if you dislike a gimbal’s buttons you can usually accomplish the same tasks by touching the phone screen instead.
  • Long battery life: Unless you’re especially worried about weight, a longer battery life is better because it means you have to charge the gimbal less often. Gimbals will usually charge your phone, too, so a bigger battery means a longer life for your phone.
  • Comfortable: A light gimbal with an ergonomic grip is much easier to hold during lengthy shoots.
  • Accessories: It’s nice, but not essential, if gimbals come with useful accessories like a carrying case and small tripod.

How we tested

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

Many gimbals performed similarly, so app design and button placement became of extra interest during testing. Photo: Signe Brewster

We tested five gimbals by filming videos with an iPhone 8 and Galaxy S8. We used the front-facing camera while walking down a street and the back-facing camera combined with the gimbals’ object-tracking modes to film a moving drone. We examined the footage for its smoothness.

We also timed how long it took to set up each gimbal, ranked how much we liked the iOS and Android apps, noted our experience using the buttons on each handle, recorded how easy it was to balance each gimbal, and noted any included accessories. Finally, we asked a customer service representative at each company how to balance their gimbal, and recorded how long it took them to respond and how helpfully they responded.

Our pick: DJI Osmo Mobile 2

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

Photo: Signe Brewster

The DJI Osmo Mobile 2 shoots stable video that will elevate any hobby videographer’s style. It has a nice selection of autonomous shooting modes, an easy-to-use app, and a comfortable handle with just a few buttons, so it’s among the easiest gimbals to learn how to use. DJI also provides the best customer service of any gimbal we tested.

The Osmo Mobile 2 gimbal’s three-axis design allowed us to shoot footage that looked smooth and shake-free, though we didn’t notice much of a difference in quality compared with our runner-up pick. We also liked the selection of autonomous modes, including ActiveTrack, which cues the gimbal to automatically track a moving object (or a still one while you move around it with the camera). The gimbal can also help you make a time lapse or keep the camera steady while you zoom or film in slow motion. The hyper-lapse and motion-lapse options combine the camera moving with a time lapse, making for even more sophisticated shots. We also thought this model’s rounded handle was more comfortable to hold than the runner-up pick’s flatter shape, and the buttons are all within easy reach of your thumb.

Most people have never used a gimbal because until recently they cost hundreds or even thousands of dollars. As a result, we consider it essential that a gimbal come with easy access to helpful customer service, a decent warranty, and easy-to-follow instructions for setup and operation. A DJI customer service representative responded almost instantly when we reached out via live chat on the company’s website. They also walked us through steps to diagnose our stated problem, instead of just pointing us toward a tutorial like the other gimbal companies did. Like all the gimbals we tested, the Osmo Mobile 2 comes with a one-year warranty.

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

The Osmo Mobile 2 has only a few buttons, which makes it easier to learn how to use but means you have to touch the phone screen more often. Photo: Signe Brewster

DJI publishes a quick-start guide for the Osmo Mobile 2, plus a more thorough instruction manual. You can also find a wide variety of DJI and third-party tutorial videos online. Overall, the gimbal comes with the most thorough set of documentation of any gimbal we tested. It took about two and a half minutes to set up the gimbal for the first time, including connecting the phone and gimbal via Bluetooth. The gimbal was already balanced, but we unbalanced it on purpose and were able to rebalance it without issue.

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

You can adjust the gimbal for different phones by turning two knobs until the phone balances properly. Photo: Signe Brewster

DJI says the Osmo Mobile 2 is compatible with phones ranging from 58.6 to 84.8 mm wide and up to 8.4 mm thick. It fit the iPhone 8 and Galaxy S8 we used for testing without issue, and can also accommodate larger phones like the iPhone XS Max. Unlike our runner-up pick, its apps for both iPhones and Android phones are fully functional and nearly identical to one another. We found it easy to find different features and set up shots.

The Osmo Mobile 2 has two buttons, a joystick and a slider, which is relatively few buttons compared with other gimbals we tested. Fewer buttons makes for a shorter learning curve, which is nice if you are picking up a gimbal for the first time and prefer to use the easier-to-decipher digital buttons in the DJI Go app. One button allows you to turn the gimbal on, and once on you can press it one, two, or three times to select different camera modes. Pressing the other button causes the camera to take a photo or start recording. The joystick moves the gimbal to point the camera left, right, up, or down. The slider lets you zoom in or out without touching the phone. You can complete any other tasks by manually moving the gimbal or navigating within the DJI Go app.

DJI says the Osmo Mobile 2 gimbal’s battery lasts up to 15 hours, which is the second-longest battery life of any gimbal we tested. It beats that of our runner-up pick, the Zhiyun Smooth 4, by three hours.

Flaws but not dealbreakers

We don’t like the DJI Go app quite as much as we like our runner-up pick’s app, ZY Play. Both apps are easy to use and packed with features, but we liked the layout of ZY Play slightly more and found it a bit easier to us to quickly adjust settings.

While learning how to use the few Osmo Mobile 2 buttons is easier, we discovered that as we grew more comfortable using the gimbals we preferred using the large array of buttons on the Zhiyun Smooth 4. Touching the phone screen when the phone is at an odd angle can be annoying, so we preferred using the physical buttons when possible.

Like any gimbal, it takes some time to learn all of the vocabulary associated with operating the Osmo Mobile 2. For example, pressing the mode button once switches you between “free mode” and “follow mode,” and the manual does not do a great job of explaining what those (important) terms mean. We recommend taking your time reading the manual and experimenting with modes you don’t fully understand to improve your skills.

Finally, the Osmo Mobile 2 is the only gimbal we tested that didn’t come with a tripod or a carrying case. The other gimbals included a short tripod that can stand the gimbal on a table or other surface while it shoots time lapses or other long shots. However, you can pair any tripod with a threaded screw mount with the Osmo Mobile 2, and chances are you would want a taller standard tripod anyway. You could buy a custom carrying case from DJI, but we’d likely just toss the Osmo Mobile 2 directly in a camera bag or purse.

Runner-up: Zhiyun Smooth 4

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

Photo: Signe Brewster

If you plan to use an iPhone with your gimbal and are okay with slower and less helpful customer service, the Zhiyun Smooth 4 has a lot of features to like. It produces video that looks just as steady as that of the Osmo Mobile 2, and it comes with just as many helpful autonomous modes. We preferred its app design and liked using the large number of buttons on its handle once we learned their purposes. However, the gimbal’s Android app does not currently support 4K video, which should be a dealbreaker for Android users. We also found its handle was slightly less comfortable than the Osmo Mobile 2 gimbal’s.

The footage we shot while walking with the Smooth 4 and while filming the drone all looked shake-free and smooth. Like our top pick, the gimbal was able to autonomously track the drone’s movement, and comes with other preprogrammed shooting modes such as motion-lapse and hyper-lapse.

The Smooth 4 fell short compared with our top pick when it came to customer service. We reached out via email and Zhiyun’s support page on Facebook. In both cases, it took a representative about 10 hours to respond, as the company is based in China and responds only during local business hours. Instead of helping us troubleshoot our problem directly, the representatives linked us to a relevant tutorial. The response was helpful—just not as personal. Like our top pick, the gimbal comes with a one-year warranty. Just make sure you buy directly from Zhiyun, as its warranty only covers devices it sells directly.

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

The Smooth 4 has more buttons than our top pick, which we preferred because we did not have to touch the phone as often. Photo: Signe Brewster

Our Smooth 4 came with a slip of paper that directed us toward a YouTube tutorial. The piece of paper didn’t look professional, but the video is well-done and helpful. It clearly lays out how to set up the gimbal and use its many buttons. It took us about three minutes to set up the gimbal for the first time. Like our top pick, the Osmo, it came already balanced. When we unbalanced it, we found it was even easier to rebalance than the Osmo because it had just one knob to turn instead of the two our top pick has.

Both the DJI Osmo Mobile 2 and the Smooth 4 are compatible with a similar range of Android and iOS phones. The iPhone 8 and Galaxy S8 we used for testing fit in the Smooth 4 gimbal’s gripper without issue. We preferred the Zhiyun app to DJI’s app because we could more easily find different features and quickly adjust settings. But while its Android and iOS apps initially looked identical, we discovered the Android app does not support 4K video. Some reviews on Amazon also mention the app crashing frequently while paired with an Android device, but we found it worked flawlessly with our Galaxy S8 aside from the 4K issue. It is possible Zhiyun will provide 4K compatibility through a software update in the future.

While the Osmo Mobile 2 has a minimal amount of buttons on its handle, the Smooth 4 is packed with buttons. This can be overwhelming at first, but over time we found ourselves using the buttons more. Not having to touch the phone screen when the phone is oriented at an awkward angle was nice, and hitting a physical button when your thumb is already on the handle is faster. The buttons are well-placed and integrate with the app seamlessly. We recommend watching the video tutorial a few times to learn the basics of how to use each button. If you’re still overwhelmed, you can always interact with the digital buttons on the phone screen instead. We found the handle was comfortable enough to hold, but its flatter shape made it feel not quite as ergonomic as the Osmo Mobile 2 gimbal’s rounded handle.

Zhiyun says the Smooth 4 model’s battery lasts up to 12 hours, which is a few hours shy of the Osmo’s but still among the longest battery life of the gimbals we came across in our research. Again, we didn’t find its flat handle quite as comfortable. It’s also technically heavier than the Osmo Mobile 2 (485 grams vs. 547 grams), but we didn’t really notice the difference.

Unlike our top pick, the Smooth 4 comes with both a carrying case and a tripod. The carrying case is made of styrofoam, which felt cheap compared with the cloth cases some of the gimbals came with, but it fit the gimbal just fine. The tripod is just a few inches tall, which works if you plan to place it on a table but is mostly useless if you don’t have a raised place to set it. You may want to invest in a full-size tripod.

The competition

Gimbals for iPhones and Android phones

We tested five gimbals, including two that turned out to be identical. Photo: Signe Brewster

The Evo Pro looks and operates identically to the Zhiyun Smooth 4—especially when you use it with the superior ZY Play app instead of the FilMic Pro app Evo also recommends. Its customer service is US-based, and answered our request within a few minutes. However, this model didn’t come with an instructional video link like the Smooth 4 did, so its setup might be more confusing for a beginner. We recommend everyone follow the Smooth 4 setup video for the Pro. The Evo Pro also has the same lack of 4K video as the Smooth 4. The Evo Pro sometimes costs more than the Smooth 4, but if you find it for a lower price or are willing to spend a bit more for better customer service, you should consider buying it instead.

The FreeVision Vilta-M has the simplest handle of any gimbal we tested and an exceptionally long 17-hour battery life. It took less than a minute to set up. We also liked its easy-to-use app and cloth carrying case. However, it costs a bit more and our customer support request via an online form didn’t seem to go through.

The Moza Mini-Mi is the least expensive gimbal we tested, but we couldn’t figure out how to connect it and the phone over Bluetooth, so it never worked correctly. It has some interesting features such as wireless charging, but we never got a chance to put this gimbal through our full tests.

This guide may have been updated by Wirecutter. To see the current recommendation, please go here.

When readers choose to buy Wirecutter’s independently chosen editorial picks, Wirecutter and Engadget may earn affiliate commissions.

[ad_2]

Source link

Facebook pulled over 1.5 million videos of New Zealand shooting

[ad_1]

The shooter wore a head-mounted camera to livestream the attack, and in his social posts and manifesto suggested that he wanted to stoke tensions that supported his anti-immigrant agenda. There’s been a concern that spreading the video is giving the attacker the exposure he wanted in addition to traumatizing viewers.

While the removal rate suggests that Facebook is having some success pulling the video, it also shows how difficult it can be to contain the spread of material like this. About 300,000 copies made it to the site before they were taken down, after all. The company’s existing mix of automated and human moderation can only do so much when it’s relatively easy to upload a video or make edits that can bypass content filters. Facebook and other internet firms may end up reviewing their methods to see if they can speed up video removals and make it harder to spread footage like this in the first place.



[ad_2]

Source link

The Polestar 2 is more than just a pretty face

[ad_1]

This meant we had to wait until we hit the ground in Geneva to check out the first electric vehicle from (parent brand) Volvo. What we encountered was a vehicle that’s nearly on par design-wise with the breathtaking (yet hybrid) Polestar 1.

This shouldn’t be too surprising considering that a focus on design is part of Polestar’s DNA. CEO Thomas Ingenlath started his career in the auto industry as a designer. That experience gives him a unique outlook.

Polestar 2

“As a designer, you’re on your own taking a decision about what design you propose and stuff and that kind of mixture of having very rational aspects in it. But at the same time, acknowledging that certain things are driven by emotions and the gut feeling and being brave enough to make a decision where you have not one hundred percent certainty — I think that is indeed a very good preparation for the job that I have to do now,” Ingenlath told Engadget.

That experience helped shape the look of the company and the Polestar 2. It’s not as sleek as the Polestar 1, but it does carry the design language of the brand with a bit of Volvo’s visual heritage thrown in for good measure.

The front of the vehicle hits you with Volvo’s Hammer of Thor headlight. But Polestar is a bit more reserved when it comes to its own logo which is the same color as the vehicle. Meanwhile, the car itself has a beefier stance than its predecessor both in the front and back.

The Polestar 2 looks like someone grabbed the Polestar 1 and squeezed the two ends of the vehicle together resulting in a taller, stockier car. The only design aspect that seems to have suffered is the rear three-quarter view of the car. It still looks good, but it’s lost some of the magic seen in the automaker’s first vehicle.

Polestar 2

The interior, with its large vertically-mounted touchscreen in the dash, seems like its mimicking Tesla, but other than fewer knobs and buttons than what you would find on a Volvo, it’s minimalistic design doesn’t feel nearly as sparse as the EV out of Fremont. The steering wheel and volume knob are borrowed directly from Volvo which is a good thing, plus, (thankfully) the gear selector is a lever instead of a series of buttons.

Wherever you look, the advantage of Polestar having Volvo as a parent company becomes clear — Volvo’s influence is everywhere. From the headlights to the interior, it’s clear how closely the sub-brand relies on its automotive parent — but it’s more than just stylized headlamps and steering wheels that help Polestar.

The automaker has the advantage of the financial backing of an established automaker behind it with access to factories, capital, and technology that Volvo has been working on for decades. “It’s super beneficial. And they will enable us to be successful with the new enterprise,” Ingenlath said. “But of course, it comes with something else, we have other problems. We have to be really careful at monitoring that balance between an agile, fast-moving startup spirit and being linked to that industrial system that helps us to develop the whole thing.”

Even with all Volvo resources at its disposal, Polestar is happy to work with other partners. Even those that aren’t traditionally in the automotive world.

The Polestar 2 is the first production vehicle to use Google’s Android platform for its infotainment system. Unlike Android Auto (which requires a smartphone), the Android platform in the car is a native system. It brings with it immediate access to Google’s suite of services and something that Ingenlath recognizes is becoming more important in the automotive world: voice control. The CEO said the feature will result in less distraction while behind the wheel. “It’s us recognizing where are our borders. Of course, we will never compete with the Google machinery having so many people feeding the system. Its learning and getting better every day. Of course, we should benefit from that kind of pace and put it into our car.”

Polestar 2

So, the Polestar 2 is full of tech, has an impressive expected range of 275 miles, uses dual motors that output 408 horsepower and 487-foot-pounds of torque, and can go from zero to 60 in about 4.7 seconds. That pits it directly against the Model 3. The Polestar’s $40,000 price tag helps cement that comparison. But Tesla still has the advantage: Its affordablish EV is available now, while we’ll have to wait for the Polestar 2.

Production is supposed to start in early 2020 and even when that spins up, for the first 12 months, the “launch edition” will cost $63,000. A lot can happen in the nearly two years it’ll take for the $40,000 version of the Polestar 2 to hit the road. The EV market is heating up with more and more options appearing all the time.

But none of the electric cars at this price range look quite as nice as the Polestar 2. Turns out hiring a designer to run the company has its advantages. But more importantly, having a CEO that’s willing to make strategic partnerships could mean the difference between a failed automaker with beautiful cars and a successful brand ready to take on the number one electric car maker in the world.

Follow all the latest news from Geneva Motor Show 2019 here!

[ad_2]

Source link

IKEA makes furniture more accessible with 3D printing

[ad_1]

If you live with disabilities, shopping for furniture can be difficult. Many common furniture items aren’t designed with accessibility in mind, and those that are can be rare or non-existent. IKEA Israel has a technological solution: 3D print pieces that make them easier to use. The store has collaborated with Milbat on ThisAbles, a project that provides 3D-printed add-ons for furniture that can be tough to use with certain conditions. Among the 13 initial items are easier-to-grab handles, bumpers to protect cabinets and lifts to raise couches.

[ad_2]

Source link

FCC clears path for terahertz wireless data

[ad_1]

The measure also sets aside 21.2GHz of spectrum to share for unlicensed devices. The airwaves in question were chosen to minimize possible interference with current “governmental and scientific” uses in those areas, such as space science.

These frequencies could lead to extremely fast wireless network data, advanced imaging and very fine-grained sensors, among other purposes. However, you might not want to get your hopes up for a cellphone with terahertz 6G any time soon. Even more so than with millimeter waves, the terahertz range would be limited by short ranges and difficulty penetrating objects. That’s what the experiments are for, though — it could establish uses that aren’t even on the radar yet.

[ad_2]

Source link

Two thirds of Android antivirus apps don’t work properly

[ad_1]

In some cases, the failure is a simple one: they’re not really scanning app code. AV-Comparatives found that are just using app whitelists or blacklists, and sometimes very broad ones at that. They may allow all apps whose package files start with “com.instagram,” but it would be trivial to create rogue apps that used a variant on that name.

The apps that passed muster came from familiar security brands, with big names like AVG, Kaspersky, McAfee and Symantec catching everything. Those that fell short had a familiar pattern, however. Many of them were written by amateurs, cookie-cutter apps or from companies that clearly aren’t focused on security. Anti-malware apps from 32 of the vendors in the test have vanished in the two months since the test took place in January.

It’s safe to say this serves as a reminder to stick to antivirus tools from companies with solid track records. However, this also illustrates the challenge Google and other store operators face in screening apps. They can verify that the apps aren’t causing harm to users or violating the law, but they can’t enforce a baseline level of quality needed to keep your phone safe.

[ad_2]

Source link

'Dota 2' app rewards you for predicting pro match winners

[ad_1]

Valve doesn't just want you to watch Dota 2 eSports matches — it wants you to have a small stake in them. It just released a Dota Pro Circuit app for Android and iOS that lets you win Shards (the in-game currency for Dota Plus members) by predictin…

[ad_2]

Source link

Steam mods will filter ‘off-topic review bombs’ from ratings

[ad_1]

One of the issues with relying on user reviews to rate content is the possibility that some of those reviews may not be written in entirely good faith. Recently Rotten Tomatoes took new steps to manage the impact of fake reviews submitted for Captain Marvel, while Netflix responded to several instances of “review bombing” by removing written reviews from its service entirely. Over the years Steam has taken a few different steps to deal with the issue, but now its latest response is a combination of automated scanning and human moderation teams.

In a blog post it explained the plan: “we’re going to identify off-topic review bombs, and remove them from the Review Score.” In practice, what it has is a tool that monitors reviews in real-time to detect “anomalous” activity that suggests something is happening. It alerts a team of moderators, who can then look through the reviews who will investigate, and if they do find that there’s a spate of “off-topic reviews,” then they’ll alert the developer, and remove those reviews from the way the game’s score is calculated, although the reviews themselves will stay up.

[ad_2]

Source link

Facebook board member met Cambridge Analytica whistleblower in 2016

[ad_1]

Andreessen stayed in touch with Wylie up until the story broke in March 2018, according to one of the sources. However, there was supposedly no “follow-up” to put Wylie’s information to work.

Andreessen’s venture capital company, Andreessen Horowitz, has declined to answer questions. In a statement, Facebook said it wasn’t aware of the data transfer to Cambridge Analytica until December 2015 and “took action,” but didn’t say when executives were aware.

The leak (if accurate) doesn’t guarantee that Mark Zuckerberg or other executives knew what was going on, but it could fill a gap in the timeline that has remained conspicuously blank. It would also raise questions as to why a major board member had talked to Wylie roughly a year and a half before Cambridge Analytica’s data abuse became public knowledge. Whatever the answers, it’s not a good look when Facebook is already grappling with investigations into its data handling.

[ad_2]

Source link

Neil deGrasse Tyson will continue with ‘Cosmos’ after investigation

[ad_1]

The investigation started in December 2018 after Katelyn Allers and Ashley Watson came forward with allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior, including groping (described as “creepy” rather than assault) and attempts at persuasion. It also resurfaced an allegation of rape from Tchiya Amet in 2014.

DeGrasse Tyson said he remembered the two newly disclosed incidents differently, but acknowledged that he might have made the women uncomfortable. He more staunchly objected to the rape allegation, stating that Amet didn’t actually remember what happened and that she made an “assumption” of wrongdoing. At the same time, he also recognized that it boiled down to evidence and encouraged an investigation.

[ad_2]

Source link