Blog

The Instant Pot Air Fryer Lid works as promised, but only for small batches

[ad_1]

Thrilled, I ordered it from Amazon. It arrived a few days later in a fairly large box, almost the size of the Instant Pot itself. Indeed, the Air Fryer Lid is not insignificant in size, measuring 13.8 by 13.7 by 12.8 inches. It weighs in at 11.7 pounds, which is not exactly feather-light, but I didn’t find it to be too heavy. Bundled with the lid is a fryer basket and a metal insert, which you can use as a broiler tray or as a way to air-fry two tiers of food at once. There’s also an Air Fryer Lid cover, which you can turn upside down to use as a resting spot for your lid when it’s hot, so you won’t damage your countertop.

Interestingly, the instructions note that you should not have the Instant Pot and the Air Fryer Lid plugged in at the same time. In fact, the Air Fryer Lid’s plug has plastic webbing around it that covers up the other outlet when plugged in. The idea here is that the Air Fryer Lid is pretty powerful, and having a couple of devices plugged in might overwhelm the circuit.

Just to try it out, I used the Air Fryer Lid to heat up some frozen chicken nuggets and frozen tater tots. I sprayed the basket with cooking spray, placed the tater tots at the bottom of the basket and the nuggets on the metal insert (the entire basket should already be in the stainless steel inner pot). Then I put the Air Fryer Lid on top — it took a little adjusting before I figured out how to place it properly, but thankfully the Lid makes that recognizable Instant Pot locking tune when it’s fitted correctly. I selected “Air Fry” at 400 degrees Fahrenheit for 20 minutes and hit start. The Air Fryer Lid came to life, and in just a few minutes it reached the desired temperature, which is far faster than my traditional oven.

About halfway through, the Air Fryer Lid beeped loudly, with the words “Turn Food” on its display. I then removed the lid and proceeded to, well, turn the food. From reading other air fryer recipes, this seems to be unique to the Air Fryer Lid. Most other air fryers just recommend you shake the basket around, and even that’s up to you; there’s certainly no flashing reminder of it on the device itself.

I also found it a little difficult to take out the hot metal insert (even with heat protectant gloves), and I had to fiddle with a couple of chopsticks to remove it in order to stir up the tots. I later jerry rigged a solution by creating a makeshift hook out of aluminum foil, which worked in a pinch, but was rather annoying. Still, after 20 minutes or so, the food was done. Both the nuggets and tots tasted just as good as if I had made them in a traditional oven, except they were maybe a little crispier. And obviously the cook time was a whole lot faster.

Instant Pot Air Fryer Lid

Next, I attempted to cook actual non-frozen food with it. I used the New York Times recipe for Air-Fryer Spicy Chicken Wings, as well as my own cobbled-together recipe for buffalo cauliflower bites. The Instant Pot fryer basket is pretty small, but I still managed to cram in a pound of wings. To my delight, they cooked beautifully. They weren’t as crunchy as deep-fried wings of course, but they were crisp enough for me. When bathed in honey chile sauce, they tasted absolutely delicious.

The buffalo cauliflower bites were more of an experiment, as I wasn’t following a recipe. I cut up some cauliflower florets, dipped them in beaten egg and then coated them in seasoned flour. I placed the bites in a single layer in the basket, and then spritzed everything with cooking spray. I then slapped on the Air Fryer Lid, set it for 400 degrees and just kept checking every 10 minutes or so to see if it was done (basically when they’re properly browned). In retrospect, I should’ve just used breadcrumbs or something else, because the flour coating took a long time to cook properly, and I had to futz with it a lot. I did finally get it all cooked, however, and tossed them in a bit of butter with lots of hot sauce, and they tasted great in the end.

On the whole, I have mixed feelings about the Air Fryer Lid. Yes, it does the job, but there are a few things about it that bother me. The small fryer basket means you’ll have to cook in multiple batches, which takes up time. It also means you’re restricted by what size of food you want to put in it. Most air fryer recipes online appear to have been developed with traditional air fryers, so you’ll have to adjust not just the amount, but also the temperature and cook time to fit the Instant Pot. Having to turn and flip the food while air frying is also a little bothersome. To be honest, if I had a choice, I’d much prefer a normal air fryer or a convection oven over the Instant Pot Air Fryer Lid, if only due to the size constraint.

Instant Pot Air Fryer Lid

But then, the Air Fryer Lid does more than just air fry. It basically turns your Instant Pot into a mini oven, so I could use it for roasting, baking, broiling or dehydrating too (those also happen to be the other preset buttons on the Air Fryer Lid). According to the Instant Pot Air Fryer Lid Cookbook, you could use it in a multi-step cooking process along with the Instant Pot itself — so you’d make mac and cheese in the Instant Pot, for example, and then brown additional melted cheese on top with the Air Fryer Lid. I haven’t done this yet, but I love the idea.

In the end, I don’t mind the Air Fryer Lid, and will likely keep it. As mentioned, it comes to temperature a lot faster than a traditional oven, and it does a wonderful job crisping up food without the mess of deep-frying. Importantly, it also saves me a ton of counter space, as it fits on top of my existing Instant Pot, and I can easily stow the lid away in a cabinet when not in use. To all the other Instant Pot fans out there, I’d recommend giving it a go — but only if you’re short on counter space like I am.

[ad_2]

Source link

The Galaxy Home Mini is finally available, but most people can’t get it

[ad_1]

This is the latest in a long line of strange developments for a device that has seemed at times destined to become vaporware. Samsung first announced the Galaxy Home at its Note 9 event in 2018. Following an appearance at CES 2019, the company didn’t share new information about the speaker until it announced a public beta later that same year. What made the beta noteworthy was that it was limited to South Korea, and, more significantly, the Galaxy Home itself wasn’t part of it. Instead, Samsung started testing the smaller Galaxy Home Mini. At this year’s CES, a company executive said Samsung would release the device sometime in “early 2020,” and following a leak on the company’s website, it seemed like the Galaxy Home Mini was on track to come out this week.

That hasn’t happened. Instead, it looks like there’s a chance the Galaxy Home Mini may end up merely being a promotional product. In any case, we’ve reached out to Samsung to find out whether it plans to release the device in the US, and we’ll update this article when we hear back.

[ad_2]

Source link

Why Clearview AI is a threat to us all

[ad_1]

Clearview AI was founded in 2017 by Richard Schwartz and now-CEO Hoan Ton-That. The company counts Peter Thiel and AngelList founder Naval Ravikant among its investors. Clearview’s technology is actually quite simple: Its facial recognition algorithm compares the image of a person’s face from security camera footage to an existing database of potential matches. Marketed primarily to law enforcement agencies, the Clearview app allows users to take and upload a picture of a person then view all of the public images of that person as well as links to where those photos were published. Basically, if you’re caught on camera anywhere in public, local law enforcement can use that image to mine your entire online presence for information about you, effectively ending any semblance of personal privacy.

However, the technology itself isn’t an issue, it’s how the company acquired its 3 billion-image database: Clearview scraped images from our collective social media profiles. Until it got caught, the company reportedly lifted pictures from Twitter, Facebook, Venmo and millions of other websites over the past few years. Twitter recently sent a cease-and-desist letter to Clearview after the company’s actions were revealed, claiming that the company’s actions violated Twitter’s policies and demanding that Clearview stop lifting images from its platform immediately.

Google and YouTube made similar claims in their cease-and-desist letter. “YouTube’s Terms of Service explicitly forbid collecting data that can be used to identify a person. Clearview has publicly admitted to doing exactly that, and in response we sent them a cease-and-desist letter,” YouTube spokesperson Alex Joseph said in a February statement to CBS News.

Facebook and Venmo sent a C&D as well, though as Slate points out, Peter Thiel currently sits on Facebook’s board, but invested $200,000 in the surveillance startup regardless.

These threats of legal consequences don’t appear to have made much of an impression on Clearview CEO, Hoan Ton-That. In a recent CBS interview, Ton-That argued that Clearview has a First Amendment right to scrape people’s online data: “The way we have built our system is to only take publicly available information and index it that way,” he said. “You have to remember that this is only used for investigations after the fact. This is not a 24/7 surveillance system.”

Corporate backlash against Clearview clearly hasn’t dissuaded law enforcement agencies from using the surveillance system either. According to the company, more than 600 police departments across the US reportedly use the Clearview service — including the FBI and DHS.

The Chicago Police Department paid $50,000 for a two-year license for the system, CBS News reports, though a spokesperson for the CPD noted that only 30 officers have access to it and the system is not used for live surveillance as it is in London.

“The CPD uses a facial matching tool to sort through its mugshot database and public source information in the course of an investigation triggered by an incident or crime,” it said in a statement to CBS.

Despite the CPD’s assurances that it would not take advantage of the system, Clearview’s own marketing team appears to be pushing police departments to do exactly that. In a November email to the Green Bay PD, acquired by BuzzFeed, the company actively encouraged officers to search the database for themselves, acquaintances, even celebrities.

“Have you tried taking a selfie with Clearview yet?” the email read. “It’s the best way to quickly see the power of Clearview in real time. Try your friends or family. Or a celebrity like Joe Montana or George Clooney.”

“Your Clearview account has unlimited searches. So feel free to run wild with your searches,” the email continued.

That’s not to say that the system is completely without merit. Participating law enforcement agencies are already using it to quickly track down shoplifting, identity theft and credit card fraud suspects. Clearview also claims that its app helped the NYPD track down a terrorism suspect last August, but the agency disputes the company’s involvement in the case. Clearview is also reportedly being used to help locate child sex victims; however, its use in those classes of cases remains anecdotal at best and runs the risk of hurting the same kids it’s aiming to help.

Using Clearview to track minors, even if done with the best of lawful intentions, is a veritable minefield of privacy and data security concerns. Because the police are expected to upload investigation images to Clearview’s servers, the company could potentially collect a massive amount of highly sensitive data on any number of underage sex abuse survivors. And given that the company’s security measures are untested, unregulated and unverified, the public has no assurances that data will be safe if and when Clearview’s systems are attacked.

What’s more, Clearview’s system suffers the same shortcomings as other facial recognition systems: It’s not as good at interpreting black and brown faces as it is for whites. The company claims that its search is accurate across “all demographic groups,” but the ACLU vehemently disagrees. When Clearview pitched its services to the North Miami Police Department back in October 2019, the company included a report from a three-member panel reading, “The Independent Review Panel determined that Clearview rated 100 percent accurate, producing instant and accurate matches for every photo image in the test. Accuracy was consistent across all racial and demographic groups.” This study was reportedly conducted using the same methodology as the ACLU’s 2018 test of Amazon’s Rekognition system, a claim that the ACLU rejects. The Civil Liberties Union notes that none of the three sitting on the review board panel had any prior experience in evaluating facial recognition systems.

“Clearview’s technology gives government the unprecedented power to spy on us wherever we go — tracking our faces at protests, [Alcoholics Anonymous] meetings church, and more,” ACLU Northern California attorney Jacob Snow told BuzzFeed News. “Accurate or not, Clearview’s technology in law enforcement hands will end privacy as we know it.”

And it’s not like the police abusing their surveillance powers for personal gain is anything new. In 2016, an Associated Press investigation discovered that police around the country routinely accessed secure databases to look up information on citizens that had nothing to do with their police work, including to stalk ex-girlfriends. In 2013, a Florida cop looked up the personal information of a bank teller he was interested in. In 2009, a pair of FBI agents were caught surveilling a women’s dressing room where teenage girls were trying on prom dresses. These are not isolated incidents. In the same year that Clearview was founded, DC cops attempted to intimidate Facebook into giving them access to the personal profiles of more than 230 presidential inauguration protesters. With Clearview available, the police wouldn’t even need to contact Facebook as Clearview has likely already scraped and made accessible the dirt the cops are looking for.

“The weaponization possibilities of this are endless,” Eric Goldman, co-director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University, told The New York Times in January. “Imagine a rogue law enforcement officer who wants to stalk potential romantic partners, or a foreign government using this to dig up secrets about people to blackmail them or throw them in jail.”

Unsurprisingly, Clearview’s financial backers remain unconcerned about the system’s potential for abuse. “I’ve come to the conclusion that because information constantly increases, there’s never going to be privacy,” David Scalzo, founder of Kirenaga Partners and early Clearview investor, told The New York Times. “Laws have to determine what’s legal, but you can’t ban technology. Sure, that might lead to a dystopian future or something, but you can’t ban it.”

Luckily, our elected representatives are starting to take notice of the dangers that unregulated facial recognition technologies like Clearview pose to the public. A handful of California cities including San Francisco, Oakland and Alameda have all passed moratoriums on their local governments’ use of the technology. California, New Hampshire and Oregon have passed restrictions at the state level and a number of other municipalities are considering taking similar steps in the near future.

Senator Edward J. Markey (D-MA) has also taken recent note of Clearview’s behavior. In January, the Senator sent a strongly worded letter to CEO Ton-That stating, “Clearview’s product appears to pose particularly chilling privacy risks, and I am deeply concerned that it is capable of fundamentally dismantling Americans’ expectation that they can move, assemble or simply appear in public without being identified.” The senator also included a list of 14 questions for Ton-That to address by Wednesday, February 12th.

Whether Clearview bows to legal and legislative pressure here in the US remains to be seen, but don’t get your hopes up. The company is already looking to expand its services to 22 countries around the world, including a number of nations which have been accused of committing human rights abuses. That includes the UAE, Qatar and Singapore, as well as Brazil and Columbia, both of which have endured years of political and social strife. There are even a few EU nations Clearview is looking to target, including Italy, Greece and the Netherlands.

Pretty soon, we won’t be able to set foot in public without our presence being noticed, cataloged and tabulated. And when the government has the ability to know where anyone is at given time, our civil liberties will irreparably erode. All so that a handful of developers and investors could make a quick buck selling our faces to the police in the name of public safety.

[ad_2]

Source link

Oil giant BP plans to be carbon neutral by 2050

[ad_1]

As part of the plan, BP said it would reorganize into a more “focused” structure that includes four groups (such as Gas & Low Carbon Energy and Innovation & Engineering) and integrators that promote sustainability and emissions reductions.

Company chief Bernard Looney (who only took the job earlier in February) wasn’t shy about the reasoning. Earth’s room for carbon output is “running out fast,” he said, and there needed to be a overhaul of global energy systems if humanity was going to keep things in check.

While this is a change of tune for BP, it also raises many questions and concerns before the company provides more details in September. To begin with, just how much will it support non-oil and gas businesses? While BP already has footholds in clean tech like solar and wind energy, there are no guarantees it’ll shift enough of its resources to those industries to make a difference. Carbon offsets wouldn’t really address the issue, either.

Timelines are also a problem. The Guardian previously learned that BP planned to expand its oil and gas production by roughly a fifth between 2018 and 2030. Unless the new CEO backs away from that objective, BP could make things worse, not better. For that matter, the 2050 goal is quite distant. It’s giving itself another three decades to contribute to global warming, and that’s assuming that one of Looney’s eventual replacements doesn’t scuttle the plans.

And then there’s the question of political action. Although BP is committing to more eco-friendly policy, some of its PAC contributions still tend to go to pro-oil politicians that deny or ignore climate change issues, while its lobbying doesn’t include much support for transitioning away from fossil fuels. It may be difficult for BP to tout a shift to cleaner energy tech if its political support undermines that goal.

[ad_2]

Source link

The LAFD will operate the first electric fire truck in North America next year

[ad_1]

The vehicle is based on Rosenbauer’s Concept Fire Truck (CFT), which has two batteries with a charge capacity of 100 kilowatt hours. This is the equivalent of around two hours’ operation, although it’ll come with an on-board diesel generator if it’s needed for longer.

The LAFD hasn’t confirmed how much the vehicle costs, but previous reports from Electrek — which originally cited the Menlo Park District as the first potential buyer of the vehicle — put it at around $6 million, which is no small investment.

It’s slated to hit the streets of Hollywood early next year, with LAFD chief Ralph Terrazas noting that the team is “looking forward to evaluation it in a real-world environment.” If it ticks all the boxes, you could expect to see more of these vehicles on the road not long after.

[ad_2]

Source link

The Morning After: Samsung announces four new phones in one day

[ad_1]

The foldable future starts now.Samsung Galaxy Z Flip hands-on: Razr who?

Now that Samsung has announced its Galaxy Z Flip will go on sale Friday, Chris Velazco couldn’t help but compare it to the just-launched Motorola Razr. The Z Flip has more powerful specs, with a Snapdragon 855+ chipset, plus 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, plus a hole-punch camera in the front. The biggest difference is its batteries add up to 3,300mAh compared to the Razr’s smaller 2510mAh cell, and it’s about $100 less, at $1,380.

So what do we know so far? Its three-stop hinge is quieter, and the smaller external display is cute, but “feels less than ideal.” Also, yes, that screen crease in its glass display is very noticeable. Still, the flex mode that splits up apps on the top and bottom of the Z Flip’s screen when it’s propped open is interesting, and we’re sure there will be more to find out over the next few days.

Samsung had too many new phones.Introducing the Galaxy S20 Ultra: More megapixels, more screen

Not only is there the Galaxy S20 and S20+, the company is also launching a third souped-up variant called the S20 Ultra. It’s a monster of a handset with a 6.9-inch screen. The standout feature, though, is its cameras.

It has the same ultra-wide 12-megapixel sensor with a 120-degree field of view as the common-variety S20. But its primary camera is capable of shooting at a full 108 megapixels — though you’re probably better off using it in the default 12-megapixel mode. (This mode uses pixel-binning to combine nine pixels into one at the sensor level.) The Ultra also has a 48-megapixel telephoto lens folded inside the chassis and offers up to 4X optical zoom. With the help of some clever software engineering, the high-resolution sensor and 4x optical zoom, known as the Space Zoom system, can dial in up to 100X hybrid zoom.

There’s more to it than just another display.Try out Windows 10X today with Microsoft’s dual-screen emulator

Microsoft introduced a new version of Windows along with its Surface Duo and Neo prototypes last year, and now developers can test out Windows 10X for themselves. That includes support for apps that work stretched across dual screens and software that smartly splits up features among them. The other big changes are new app restrictions that keep software from the core OS. Microsoft says it’s for security and speed — we’ll see if that sticks this time around.

The emphasis here is on speed and autofocus accuracy.Nikon’s D6 flagship DSLR camera arrives in April for $6,500

Nikon has officially unveiled its professional D6 DSLR and revealed the price and release date, after first teasing the camera in September. It has a 20.8-megapixel full-frame (FX) sensor and can capture 8-megapixel stills at 30 fps, 2-megapixel stills at 60 fps and 4K video at 30 fps. That brings its video specs a bit short of Canon’s 1DX III, if that makes a difference for you.

The other S20sThe Galaxy S20 and S20+ sport fast screens and crazy sharp cameras

Prices for the mainstream Galaxy S20s start at just under $1,000 and go up from there. For that, you get some powerful hardware, with Snapdragon 865 CPUs, at least a 4,000mAh battery and minimum 12GB of RAM. All three models have variants that support 5G, but not all of them work with all forms. They have high-speed 120Hz panels and cameras that come with Samsung’s “biggest sensor ever,” capable of capturing 8K video.

They’re Samsung’s first flagship phones of the decade, so check out how the S20 and S20+ stack up against the competition.

Incredible shooting speeds but lacks high-end video features.Olympus E-M1 III review: Fast, but way behind flagship camera rivals

Olympus’ latest flagship camera, the O-MD E-M1 Mark III isn’t particularly exciting. Sorry. It is a bit faster than the last model and has improved and more versatile autofocus. It also features a class-leading five-axis image stabilization system that makes handheld photography better.

However, the autofocus system isn’t good enough, and it’s not great for low-light shooting. It also falls short of similarly priced rivals like the Panasonic GH5 when it comes to video. While it’s great for wildlife and action photographers, for everyone else, there are better cameras out there. Steve Dent tested it out for a while.

The California Public Utilities Commission still needs to give the thumbs upT-Mobile and Sprint merger approved by federal judge

T-Mobile and Sprint’s $26.5 billion merger is almost complete. Following months of delays and pushback from high-profile authorities, a US district judge has ruled in the companies’ favor, allowing them to move within one step of concluding a deal that promises to deploy 5G service to 97 percent of Americans within three years.

In the ruling, US District Judge Victor Marrero agreed that while Sprint had attempted to compete with AT&T and Verizon, it had fallen short of its rivals. Judge Marrero also credited T-Mobile with forcing AT&T and Verizon (Engadget’s parent company) to improve their consumer offerings in response to its Un-carrier strategy and a push for cheaper and wider 5G coverage. Critics, including rival carriers’ state attorneys general, said that the merger would “severely undermine competition in the telecommunications sector,” in turn “driving up prices, limiting coverage and diminishing quality.”

Somehow, it’s still not over, though. The deal now rests in the hands of the California Public Utilities Commission. T-Mobile and Sprint filed their merger there in July 2018, but the organization has yet to make a decision.

But wait, there’s more…

The Morning After is a new daily newsletter from Engadget designed to help you fight off FOMO. Who knows what you’ll miss if you don’t Subscribe.

Craving even more? Like us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter.

Have a suggestion on how we can improve The Morning After? Send us a note.



[ad_2]

Source link

Nintendo is adding more SNES and NES games to Switch Online

[ad_1]

The gaming giant is also adding two NES titles to the service this month: Shadow of the Ninja, a classic side-scrolling action platformer, and the powerboat racing game Eliminator Boat Duel. Nintendo first added SNES games to Switch Online in September, starting with its most famous titles such as Super Mario Kart, Super Mario World and A Link to the Past. Shortly after that, Nintendo clarified that SNES and NES games won’t arrive at a steady pace for Switch Online. In fact, the company didn’t release new titles after its initial SNES rollout until December 2019.

Aside from the new Switch Online additions, Nintendo has officially announced the release date for Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX. The “enhanced reimagining” of the franchise’s dungeon-crawling spinoffs, Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Red Rescue Team for the GBA and Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Blue Rescue Team for the DS, is making its way to the Switch on March 6th for $60.

[ad_2]

Source link

China rolls out ‘close contact detection app’ for coronavirus

[ad_1]

According to Xinhua, “close contact” includes people who work together, share a classroom or live in the same house, as well as medical professionals working with patients, and passengers on mass transit. If the app determines a user has been in close proximity to someone who has or is showing symptoms of the virus, they will be instructed to stay at home.

Xinhua has not disclosed exactly how the government-developed app works, nor how it determines the risk of exposure. However, the news agency reports that it has received support from several government agencies including the National Health Commission, the Ministry of Transport, China Railway and the Civil Aviation Administration of China to ensure “accurate, reliable and authoritative data.”

The app’s requirement for ID numbers as raised some concerns with privacy critics — the Chinese government is well-known for conducting high levels of surveillance on its citizens. Others, however, maintain that stemming the spread of the virus — so far responsible for more than 1,000 deaths — outweighs the need for individual privacy.

[ad_2]

Source link

Nikon’s D6 flagship DLSR camera arrives in April for $6,500

[ad_1]

The D6 still packs a 20.8-megapixel full-frame (FX) sensor, but now has a much faster Expeed 6 processor. As such, burst shooting is boosted to 14 fps (up from 12 fps on the D5) with the mechanical shutter and 10.5 fps with the silent shooting electronic shutter in live view mode. If that won’t do, you can capture 8-megapixel stills at 30 fps and 2-megapixel stills at 60 fps. By comparison, Canon’s new 1DX Mark III can shoot at 16 fps with the mechanical shutter, or 20 fps in electronic shutter mode at full resolution.

Nikon D6 professional full-frame FX format DSLR

Nikon reduced the number of autofocus points from 153 to 105, but made them all selectable and cross-type. That makes for 60 percent more autofocus coverage, the company said. It also improved low-light autofocus capability down to -4.5 EV for the center point, or -4 EV for the other points. Meanwhile, standard native ISO range still goes from 100 to 102,400.

On the video side, the D6 is still limited to 4K shooting at 30 fps. While that spec was good when the D5 came out in 2016, Canon’s 1DX III has trumped it massively with 12-bit 5.5K RAW video shooting, or 4K 10-bit at 60 fps. Video has never been an important market for this type of camera, but Canon is clearly trying to change that.

Like its 1DX III rival, the D6 will pack dual XQD/CFExpress memory card slots, doing away with the Compact Flash media Nikon’s pro DSLRs have used until now. The D6 also has a gigabit ethernet port for tethered shooting. The D6 is arriving in April of 2020, just in time for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic games, at a suggested retail price of $6,500.

[ad_2]

Source link

BlueMail is back in the App Store after it called out Apple

[ad_1]

Last year, the developer wrote an open letter to Tim Cook, asking him to “treat small developers with fairness and empathy.” And, on February 4th, Blix addressed the developer community in “a call for unity against the biggest tech.” In its more recent letter, the company detailed the difficulties it faced in getting its app relisted, including being told that BlueMail couldn’t be approved because it didn’t work with macOS Catalina when it did, as well as being given contradictory guidance by different Apple teams.

Blix says when it submitted a new version of the app on February 6th, it was quickly approved. Even so, it has no intention of dropping its case against Apple. Blix co-founder Ben Volach said in a statement:

“We’re happy that users can once again get BlueMail through the Mac App Store, but we know this isn’t the end. Our experience has shown that until the app review process includes effecve checks and balances, Apple holds too much power over small developers. One solution could be to include external independent members and observers in Apple’s App Review Board, just as a public company’s Board of Directors represents its shareholders.”



[ad_2]

Source link