Blog

US limits AI exports over fears it will fall into Chinese hands

[ad_1]

The rule is the first one to be nailed down as part of a larger requirement for tighter exports on sensitive technology to countries with a less-than-friendly attitude toward the US. It’s meant to both prevent these nations from easily copying American technology (and thus negating economic advantages) or identifying security weaknesses.

While this limits the reach of AI that could be useful for genuinely helpful purposes, such as identifying the effects of climate change or urban sprawl, it might also be a relief to an industry worried about harsher restrictions. After all, the US blacklisted Huawei over its fears of Chinese surveillance. It wouldn’t have been a stretch for the government to outright ban key AI exports.

[ad_2]

Source link

Samsung might launch its next Galaxy flagship phones on February 11th

[ad_1]

Samsung’s next Unpacked event, where it usually unveils its flagship devices, may be just over a month away. An unreleased promo video unearthed by Twitter user @water8192, This is Tech Today and Max Weinbach of XDA Developers teases the launch of a new Galaxy device — or devices, if the two quadrilateral shapes in the teaser are a hint of what’s to come — on February 11th, 2020. Like the previous Unpacked shows before it, the event will have a live broadcast you can stream through Samsung’s website.



[ad_2]

Source link

The best wireless powered bookshelf speakers

[ad_1]

Why you should trust us

I’ve been reviewing audio gear professionally since 1990, currently as an editor for the SoundStage Network and previously as an editor or writer for Sound & Vision, Home Theater Review, Home Theater Magazine, and numerous other publications. In that time, I’ve conducted and published more blind tests of audio products than any other journalist in the world. Over the past 28 years, I’ve tested and measured countless traditional stereo speakers and have evaluated more than 300 wireless speakers.

Three additional listeners helped me on this guide; all have served as panelists on many of my tests for Wirecutter and Sound & Vision: Lauren Dragan, Wirecutter’s headphone editor; Geoffrey Morrison, Wirecutter editor at large and columnist for CNET and Forbes.com; and John Higgins, a professional musician and composer who has also written for Wirecutter and Home Theater Magazine.

Who should get this

Wireless powered bookshelf speakers are for those who want the convenience of all-in-one Bluetooth or Wi-Fi speakers, with the sound quality of a traditional stereo system. Also called active speakers, these speaker systems have built-in amplifiers and wireless receivers, so all you need to add is a source device, such as a smartphone, a computer, a TV, or a record player. In general, these systems sound better than all-in-one speakers because the two speakers can be spread apart to create an enveloping, natural stereo effect—and because many are large enough to accommodate larger woofers that produce deeper, more powerful bass.

When done right, these systems can actually sound better than comparably priced traditional stereo bookshelf systems. Because the speakers are designed and built as a system, all of the components are chosen to work together to deliver the best sound. Most of them have digital signal processors that permit the design engineers to tune them much more precisely than traditional analog audio circuitry allows. That digital processing includes a limiter that, if properly configured by the design engineers, prevents the speaker from being played loud enough to the point where it sounds bad or might suffer damage.

The design of these speakers varies, but most have a separate woofer (for bass) and tweeter (for treble) in each speaker; this design is generally considered to deliver the best possible sound from a small speaker. The electronics and amplification are built into one of the speakers (which needs to be plugged into a power outlet), and a standard speaker cable connects that speaker to the other one—so it’s not a truly wireless setup.

All of the wireless stereo speaker systems we’ve found incorporate Bluetooth, and some incorporate Wi-Fi, in the form of Apple AirPlay, DTS Play-Fi, or Google Chromecast. All have at least one analog audio input; many also offer digital inputs, and some include an input for a record player. (Any speaker system with an analog input can be used with a record player, as long as the record player has a built-in phono preamp (as most of our turntable picks do), or an outboard phono preamp is added.) Most have controls for only volume and input, although a few of the models we found have tone controls, and some include remote controls. Some have an output for a subwoofer, which is important if you want lots of bass; adding a subwoofer to a system without a subwoofer output is impractical or impossible.

For most listeners, the only disadvantage of these systems is that they include two separate speakers that are connected with a wire, so they’re not as tidy or unobtrusive as all-in-one speakers. For audio enthusiasts, a potential disadvantage is that the system can’t be expanded or upgraded by, for example, substituting in a more powerful amplifier.

How we picked

Bookshelf speakers

Here you can see how the sizes of the individual speakers compare. From left: the Edifier S1000DB, Klipsch R-51PM, and Audioengine HD3. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

Going into this article, I’d already heard many of these systems (or at least prototype versions of them) at various audio shows, including CES and Rocky Mountain Audio Fest. We decided to include only speakers that offer at least Bluetooth connectivity, although several of them also include Wi-Fi and/or an input for a record player. After I searched Amazon, Best Buy, Crutchfield, and other sites, I put together a list of the various models available. We set a price range of $250 to $800; if you’re interested in a less-expensive option, check out our best computer speakers guide.

I contacted manufacturers to request testing samples, and to make sure the models on my list were all current. We ended up with 10 models, including the brands Audioengine, Edifier, Kanto, Klipsch, SVS, and Vanatoo.

How we tested

Upon receiving the systems, I broke them in by playing at least 10 hours of music through each one at a moderately loud volume. I then gave each system a long listen to make sure none were obviously poor performers that wouldn’t stand a chance of being chosen by our blind listening panel. For these sessions, I used music streamed from my Samsung Galaxy S9 smartphone. I also used my Music Hall Ikura turntable, which is equipped with an Ortofon Blue moving-magnet cartridge, to connect to systems that had phono inputs.

For our blind testing sessions, I used the speakers’ analog inputs fed by my custom-built audio testing switcher, and I let the panelists use their smartphones as their music source, so they could play any tunes they wanted. I placed the speakers at equal heights on stands I built specifically for blind speaker testing, and I draped a thin piece of black fabric in front of the speakers so that the panelists couldn’t see which ones were playing.

All speakers were played at matched levels, which I did by feeding the Dolby test noise recorded from a Denon receiver through all the systems and measuring the levels using an NTi Minilyzer audio analyzer and Mini SPL measurement microphone set for flat response (i.e., no A- or C-weighting) because the shaped noise from the Dolby test noise provided the optimal weighting.

After I had the panelists’ initial results, I offered to let them listen again to any of the speakers we’d tested and compare them with any other models. I then revealed the identities of the speakers and solicited the panelists’ comments about each system’s design and features.

Note that we didn’t give extra points for fancier Bluetooth technologies, such as the aptX and AAC codecs, although we will point out below which ones each product includes. In the online Bluetooth blind test you can find on my website, it’s pretty clear that the differences among these technologies are subtle. The differences between speakers, however, are not subtle.

Our pick: Edifier S1000DB

Bookshelf speakers

Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

The Edifier S1000DB is just what a wireless bookshelf speaker system should be. It starts with good-quality, well-tuned speakers, then adds amplification, Bluetooth, and other convenient features and connection options. Three of our four panelists picked it as their favorite of all the larger models we evaluated in our blind tests. At 13.3 inches high, 11.5 inches deep, and 7.9 inches wide, the S1000DB speakers are fairly large, which is surely part of the reason they sound good, but it may make them too large for desktops and some bookshelves.

The S1000DB is the only system in our test that our panelists thought had respectable deep-bass response, and the quality of the bass was generally good—it didn’t boom the way some small speakers do when trying to play deep-bass notes. Although none of our panelists raved about the sound, none of them noticed any real problems. Geoff summed it up when he said, “It didn’t really excel in any way, but it sounded best on average with all the tracks I listened to.”

Bookshelf speakers

The speaker on the right contains the amplifiers, inputs, and other electronics. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

The S1000DB has a pretty nice feature set, with aptX Bluetooth, two stereo analog inputs, optical and coaxial digital inputs, and bass and treble controls. The cable between the two speakers runs 16 feet, the longest of all the non-Edifier models we tested. A sleek little remote control lets you adjust volume and select the input. A removable grille (which we didn’t show here) protects the woofers and tweeters from prying fingers.

Bookshelf speakers

The speaker cable that connects the two Edifier speakers uses a proprietary connector, but the cable is 16 feet long, so it’s unlikely you’d need a longer one. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

However, the S1000DB lacks some features found on competing models. There’s no practical way to connect it to a subwoofer, and it doesn’t include phono inputs or Wi-Fi. You can add those features by connecting external devices, such as a phono preamp or an Echo Dot, but that adds cost and complexity.

Bookshelf speakers

Bass and treble tone controls make it easy to fine-tune the S1000DB’s sound. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

These speakers are beautifully crafted, with real wood sides. That said, their styling is reminiscent of typical high-end speakers from the 1990s—it’s not what we’d call cool or contemporary. Because they have rear bass ports, they can’t be pushed tight against a wall, because blocking the ports will reduce the bass.

Bookshelf speakers

The Edifier speakers come with a basic but sleek remote that allows for volume and input adjustment. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

No major audio publications seem to have reviewed the S1000DB, but The Test Pit raved about them, saying, “All that real estate is well used and the resulting sound is clean and beyond powerful.” Audio Rumble agrees, stating, “These are definitely among the most capable bookshelf speakers you can get for less than $500 at the moment.” In 186 Amazon user reviews to date, the S1000DB has earned an average rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars, although the Fakespot grade is a C.

Also great: Audioengine HD3

Bookshelf speakers

Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

The Audioengine HD3 is a totally different kind of speaker system from our top pick. At 7 inches high, 5.5 inches deep, and 4.25 inches wide, each of the HD3 speakers is only about one-seventh the size of one of the Edifier S1000DB speakers. They produce a surprisingly full and balanced sound for such small speakers, but they don’t have the deep-bass response of our main pick. The HD3 system also has lots of great features, including a USB input, a headphone output, and an analog output to connect a subwoofer.

Among the smaller speakers we tested, Lauren and John ranked the HD3 system first, and Geoff ranked it second—and this system was Lauren’s favorite of all the speakers we tested. “This would be my pick for most people,” she said, and that was before she saw how compact the HD3 system is. With “woofers” measuring just 2.75 inches, the HD3 system can’t put out any real bass, but it’s tuned so that its lack of bass doesn’t leave it sounding thin. It also doesn’t play super-loud; I found myself turning it up all the way most of the time I used it. But with sound that’s loud enough to fill a bedroom or an office, and a design compact enough to fit on any desktop, the HD3 is an ideal choice for many situations.

Bookshelf speakers

All the electronics and inputs are on the right speaker. A removable grille, shown on the right speaker, protects the woofer and tweeter from damage. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

Two analog inputs are included, and there’s also a USB digital input for use with computers and smartphones (but no optical or coaxial digital input). An analog output makes it easy to connect most subwoofers, such as those featured in our guide to the best budget subwoofer, and a bass reduction switch makes it easier to blend the HD3 speakers with the subwoofer (and also allows the HD3s to play louder when used with a sub). There’s also a front headphone jack, which is very convenient for desktop use. There’s no phono input or Wi-Fi capability, but these features can be added through the use of outboard accessories.

Bookshelf speakers

The HD3 uses standard speaker-cable binding posts, so you can swap the stock cable that connects the two speakers with a longer one. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

The HD3 includes aptX HD, which is the only upgraded version of Bluetooth I’ve found that offers a significant performance improvement over the standard SBC Bluetooth codec. (Note that only a few Android smartphones are currently compatible with aptX HD, and that no Apple products are compatible with any variant of aptX.) It also includes AAC, a codec used by Apple iTunes and some streaming services; Apple phones and tablets are compatible with AAC, so this feature could deliver a slight improvement in sound quality for Apple fans.

Bookshelf speakers

The front panel of the right speaker includes a handy ⅛-inch (3.5 mm) headphone jack. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

The HD3 has received numerous professional reviews, including one in which PCMag’s Tim Gideon said the HD3 “allows for an ideal combination of high-quality Bluetooth streaming and wired playback at a reasonable price,” and another where Jack Roberts, from the high-end audio site Dagogo.com, called them “the best desktop speakers I have ever heard.” Amazon user reviews average only 3.9 stars out of 5 stars (with a Fakespot grade of A), but most of the unsatisfied reviewers seem to have somewhat unrealistic expectations of what such small speakers can do.

Bookshelf speakers

The Bass switch filters out audio frequencies below 100 Hz, allowing the HD3 system to blend smoothly with a subwoofer. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

We also read complaints about the first couple of seconds of audio selections being cut off when the USB input is used, but we couldn’t replicate this effect; perhaps a firmware update has fixed the problem, as this system has been out for about a year and half.

Also great: Klipsch R-51PM

Bookshelf speakers

Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

Klipsch’s R-51PM is the most versatile choice of all our picks because it includes a phono input for connecting to a turntable, plus USB, optical digital, and analog inputs and a subwoofer output—but that versatility comes with a higher price. Our panelists ranked the R-51PM just slightly behind the Edifier S1000DB in sound quality. Everyone agreed it had a reasonably full and natural sound, but all said they’d prefer a little more bass. At 13.3 inches high by 9.1 inches deep by 7 inches wide, the R-51PM speakers aren’t quite as bulky as our top pick, and they have a more contemporary look.

Bookshelf speakers

The left speaker holds the electronics, the inputs, and the power indicator. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

While many inexpensive turntables have a phono preamp or Bluetooth built in and thus don’t need a dedicated phono input, anyone wanting to use a higher-quality turntable or an older turntable will need a phono input—so its inclusion on the R-51PM makes for a clean, easy setup. Any of our picks can be adapted for use with these turntables through the addition of an outboard phono preamp, but that’s more money to spend, plus an extra set of cables to connect, plus an extra power supply.

Bookshelf speakers

The only control offered on the R-51PM system is volume. Standard speaker-cable connectors are used, so you can sub in a longer cable if you need it. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

In addition to Bluetooth and the phono input, the R-51PM has other nice connection options, including USB and optical digital audio inputs, plus an extra 3.5 mm analog input. Thus, it’ll connect easily to computers and TVs so it can serve as a complete audio system. It’s especially suitable for use with a TV because the manual provides codes for programming remotes from DirecTV and RCA satellite receivers and AT&T, Bright House, and Xfinity cable boxes to control the R-51PM’s volume and mute functions. There’s also a removable grille (not shown here) to protect the woofers and tweeters.

Bookshelf speakers

The Line/Phono switch sets the red and white RCA jacks to the right to work with a turntable output or a standard line audio source. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

As I said above, the R-51PM produces a reasonably full and natural sound, but all of our panelists would’ve preferred a little more bass. This system does have a defeatable dynamic bass control that boosts the bass at low volumes, but it didn’t seem to help, especially considering we did most of our testing at moderately loud levels. However, the inclusion of a subwoofer output does allow you to add your own subwoofer, and the R-51PM’s remote control includes subwoofer output-level controls, so you can fine-tune the bass level without adjusting your subwoofer’s controls.

Bookshelf speakers

The Klipsch system comes with a nice remote that includes subwoofer output-level controls, so you can fine-tune the bass level without having to make adjustments on the subwoofer itself (if you add one). Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

While the R-51PM speakers aren’t quite as bulky as the Edifier S1000DB speakers, they also have rear bass ports, which means they can’t be backed up tight against a wall without affecting the sound quality. Klipsch also offers a smaller model with the same inputs and features, the R-41PM, but no samples were available at the time we did the tests for this article.

The R-51PM system was brand-new at the time of this writing, so we couldn’t find any professional reviews of it. The one Amazon review we saw is from someone who seemed to have not read the owner’s manual.

What to look forward to

There are a few systems in this category that we weren’t able to get in time for this article. The Kanto Tuk is a higher-end version of the Kanto YU6 tested here, with aptX HD and higher-quality woofers and tweeters. The JBL Control XStream includes Wi-Fi capability with Spotify Connect and Chromecast (in addition to Bluetooth) and a splash-proof design. The Totem Acoustic Kin Play includes Bluetooth plus a phono input, although it looks as if it will exceed our price cap for this article. The Vanatoo Transparent One Encore brings the concepts of the Transparent Zero tested here into a more conventional, box-shaped speaker.

The competition

The Audioengine HD6 is a larger version of the HD3, one of our top picks, but only one of our panelists liked the sound.

The Klipsch R-41PM is a smaller version of the R-51PM, with the same inputs and features. Samples were not available at the time we did the tests for this article.

The Edifier AirPulse A100 sounds a little better than our top pick, with somewhat clearer treble, and it looks nicer, but it’s more than twice as costly—and we don’t think the performance improvements merit that big of a price increase.

The Edifier S2000pro is similar to our top pick, but it adds professional-style XLR balanced inputs and has a different tweeter. I thought its treble didn’t sound as smooth as the S1000DB’s.

The Kanto YU4 has a cool design, a phono input, and a reasonable price, but only one of our panelists really liked its sound. A larger version, the Kanto YU6, won over two of our panelists, but the other two weren’t impressed.

We hoped to test the Peachtree Audio M25, but the company says it will be discontinued early in 2019.

The SVS Prime Wireless is a new system with DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi–based audio, in addition to Bluetooth and a subwoofer output; I liked it, but the rest of our panelists felt it needed more bass.

The Vanatoo Transparent Zero is an unusual trapezoidal design with passive radiators to reinforce the bass. It’s a well-tuned speaker, but our panelists preferred the similarly sized and priced Audioengine HD3.

This guide may have been updated by Wirecutter. To see the current recommendation, please go here.

When readers choose to buy Wirecutter’s independently chosen editorial picks, Wirecutter and Engadget may earn affiliate commissions.

[ad_2]

Source link

Nearly the whole US military has banned TikTok

[ad_1]

There are no restrictions on use with personal devices, but officials have encouraged personnel and their kids to uninstall the app.

The Air Force and Coast Guard didn’t provide specific reasoning for the ban, but it’s likely to be consistent with earlier bans. There’s been concerns that TikTok’s ownership might leave it susceptible to pressure from the Chinese government to hand over sensitive data, although the company recently said that China didn’t request any info in the first half of 2019.

And like spokeswoman Maj. Malinda Singleton told the WSJ, some of the issues are “not unique” to any one social media platform. Hostile governments could theoretically recruit people through social networks, and there’s a chance that personnel could inadvertently reveal military secrets or expose themselves to attack. Warnings like this are rare (the Defense Department cautioned against using Pokémon Go in 2016), but they’re not shocking given the potential for oversharing.

[ad_2]

Source link

The Morning After: Disney+ is losing some old movies

[ad_1]


It’s time.CES 2020: What to expect

The annual event for all things tech kicks off in Las Vegas next week, and we’ll be there to check it all out. Here’s a sneak peek at what to expect in cars, home automation, TVs, computers and 5G.


8K TVs! Better ultraportables! Sex tech!Engadget Podcast: CES 2020 here we come!

This week, Devindra and Cherlynn chat about how the infamous trade show has evolved over the years, and the new innovations they’re actually looking forward to.


And no, you can’t keep them by downloading them.Disney+ loses some movies due to old licensing deals

Disney only launched its streaming service a few months ago, but several movies that were available at launch are no longer available for viewing. Those include flicks like Home Alone 1 & 2, Dr. Dolittle and Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides. The culprit? Licensing deals signed long ago that occasionally make those titles exclusive to other channels or services.


Remember where Xbox, Nintendo and PlayStation were 10 years ago?The 10-year challenge: Video game edition

A decade is a long time in gaming, and Jessica Conditt is ready to run down how all the major players have changed their positions since 2009. Take Activision, for example. In 2009, its top product was Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, and in 2019, its top product was Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. Wait…


Subscribers will be refunded for their latest payment.Google is killing digital magazines in News

Did you remember that Google offered paid magazine subscriptions? Well, it doesn’t now. A company spokesperson has confirmed the change to Engadget, noting that the program worked with under 200 publishers. Subscribers won’t be able to purchase new magazine issues anymore, but they can thankfully still keep accessing old issues (PDFs and other formats) in the Google News app via the Following or Favorites tab.

But wait, there’s more…


The Morning After is a new daily newsletter from Engadget designed to help you fight off FOMO. Who knows what you’ll miss if you don’t Subscribe.

Craving even more? Like us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter.

Have a suggestion on how we can improve The Morning After? Send us a note.



[ad_2]

Source link

Google is killing digital magazines in News

[ad_1]

Google News will no longer offer a paid magazine subscriptions. According to Android Police, the News team sent out an email to customers, telling them that the company is killing print-replica magazines in Google News. A company spokesperson has confirmed the change to Engadget, noting that the program worked with under 200 publishers. Subscribers won’t be able to purchase new magazine issues anymore, but they can thankfully still keep accessing old issues (PDFs and other formats) in the Google News app via the Following or Favorites tab. In addition, the tech giant is refunding subscribers their latest payment within 30 days.

[ad_2]

Source link

Y2K-type glitch is causing NYC parking meters to reject credit cards

[ad_1]

A software glitch is causing parking meters throughout New York City to reject credit and prepaid parking cards, The New York Times reports. The payment software was set to expire on January 1st, and the vendor reportedly failed to update the software before the new year. So, at the stroke of midnight Wednesday, the city rang in a bug reminiscent of those feared around Y2K, which predicted computer systems would crash.

[ad_2]

Source link

TikTok-owner ByteDance reportedly built a deepfake maker

[ad_1]

On one hand, the feature could be seen as a natural evolution of other face swapping tech. On the other hand, it could have some very unpleasant repercussions. We’ve already seen how deepfake technology can be used for harm, so making the tech more accessible seems like a bad idea. As TechCrunch points out, the feature also raises concerns about what ByteDance could do with sensitive biometric data.

It’s unclear if this feature will ever be released to Douyin or TikTok users (together the apps have 1.5 billion downloads). The code was found in both apps by an Israeli research firm Watchful.ai, but TikTok reportedly told TechCrunch that the deepfake feature is “definitely not a function in TikTok, nor do we have any intention of introducing it.” TikTok later told TechCrunch that it was removing the inactive code fragments to eliminate any confusion.

Engadget has reached out to ByteDance for confirmation and comment.

[ad_2]

Source link

The best Bluetooth tracker | Engadget

[ad_1]

How we picked and tested

Over the past few years, we’ve tested more than a dozen Bluetooth trackers. The major players in this category are well known. But to make sure we didn’t miss any, we turned to Amazon and Google during our research for a previous version of this guide. The latter turned up some great comparative reviews from The Wall Street Journal, Yahoo, Tom’s Guide, and Wired.

Here’s what we look for in a great Bluetooth tracker:

  • Size: A tracker that’s too obtrusive to carry around with you or to attach to the thing you want to track is useless. Smaller and lighter is better.
  • Range: The longer the range, the farther you can be from the tracker and still be able to find your lost item.
  • Volume: If you’re near your tracker but you can’t hear it, that’s no good. Despite having little space for a speaker, some of these can get quite loud!
  • Network size: Most Bluetooth trackers can utilize other phones that have the tracker’s app installed to silently search for your lost objects—so the more people who use a platform, the better your chances of recovering lost stuff.
  • Other features: A replaceable battery isn’t absolutely required, but it’s a big plus. We also prefer trackers that can be used to trigger an alarm on your phone. An app that is easy to navigate and that updates location information quickly is also important.

The most important test we conducted was to determine each tracker’s potential range—how far away we could move a paired smartphone from the tracker before the Bluetooth connection was lost. In 2019, we tested the range in Wirecutter’s 190-foot-long New York City office. We set each tracker on a shelf, triggered it to ring, and then walked away with our paired iPhone while measuring the distance using a measuring wheel. Once the tracker’s smartphone app showed the tracker as out of range or we physically hit the wall, we recorded the distance. We repeated this test at least five times per tracker and calculated the average distance for each tracker for both measurements.

We also tested the loudness of each tracker’s alarm chime—a feature that’s useful for finding a lost device that’s still within earshot—by placing it directly next to a digital sound pressure level (SPL) meter and noting the peak volume.

Our pick: Tile Mate (2020)

Bluetooth tracker

Photo: Michael Murtaugh

If you’re going to buy a tracker to keep tabs on your keys, bag, or other gear, it should be the Tile Mate (2020). Tile trackers are the most popular by far, which is important if you ever need to take advantage of the crowd-finding feature (more on that in a bit). And this model offers the right combination of range, alarm volume, and price. It also has a user-replaceable battery, addressing the single biggest drawback of older Tile devices, and it’s small enough to fit on a keychain.

The Tile Mate is a round-cornered square that’s about 1.38 inches across and 0.24 inches thick—smaller than a matchbook. It’s made of white plastic and has a flat button in the center. An opening in the top left corner lets you attach a keychain, lanyard, or similar tether. This Tile Mate is identical to the 2019 model, at least on the outside.

In our distance test, the Tile Mate didn’t have the best range we’d ever seen from a Bluetooth tracker, but it was impressive enough that we don’t think most people need to spend the extra money on the Tile Pro. We were able to get an average of about 152 feet away before losing the connection with our iPhone. That’s less than the 200 feet that Tile advertises, but it’s still an impressive number—and 50 feet more than the previous version of the Tile Mate offered. Although the Tile Pro outperformed this figure, 150 feet is longer than you might think it is—about one and a half times the length of a basketball court—and it’s plenty of allowance for most homes or offices. If you regularly leave your stuff in more-remote spaces, or you just want the extra peace of mind, the Tile Pro will serve you well: The Tile Pro made it to the end of our 190-foot-long office without losing its connection.

Tile advertises the Tile Pro as being louder than the Tile Mate, but side by side, they sounded about the same and measured the same on our sound meter. We measured both at just over 104 dB, which is far louder than the previous versions of both—or any other tracker we’ve tested—and it’s certainly loud enough to hear on the opposite side of an office or apartment.

If the Tile is out of Bluetooth range, you can view a map displaying its location the last time your phone made contact with it. If your phone is no longer at that location—or you’re worried that it won’t be—you can mark the item as lost, which will invoke Tile’s crowd-finding feature. Other trackers have similar crowd-finding features, but the Tile’s big strength here is the size of its crowd. Tile tells us it has sold more than 26 million trackers, a claimed 90 percent of the Bluetooth tracker market. According to the company’s figures, 6 million items are found daily, and of those marked as lost, Tile says 90 percent are found. (As a point of reference, the Tile app tells you how many other active Tile users are within roughly 5 to 6 miles of your current location.)

With older Tile models, each tracker lasted only about a year before its internal battery was drained and the entire tracker had to be replaced. The current Tile Mate and the Tile Pro both use replaceable batteries (in the Tile Mate, it’s a standard CR1632 lithium battery) that are easily accessible via a slide-off door on the back. Tile says the battery will last a year before it needs to be replaced; you can easily find these batteries for less than $1 apiece. (If you upgrade an older Tile through the reTile program, you’ll receive one of the new ones.)

Tile Mate

The battery in a Tile Mate should last about a year, at which point you can easily replace it yourself. Photo: Michael Murtaugh

Because the battery door could possibly be reinstalled incorrectly, Tile can’t call the Tile Mate waterproof. But the company has told us it still considers this tracker to be water-resistant, which means that dropping it in a puddle or having it out in the rain shouldn’t kill it. According to Tile, test units survived 1,000 cycles in a dryer, so you should expect the hardware to last longer than the battery.

Tile offers Tile Premium, an optional, $3-per-month (or $30-per-year) subscription service that covers as many Tiles as you own. The services include free battery replacements shipped to you each year, a warranty extension from one year to three, and SMS-based support. On the software side, there’s a 30-day location history, unlimited sharing of your Tiles’s locations, and smart alerts that let you know when you’ve left home without any of your Tiles. The last feature is based on entering your home address, and in our testing, we could get a third of a mile away before getting the alert, which isn’t super-handy. We think Tile Premium is an unnecessary expense for most people.

Setting up any Tile is simple: Instead of having to go into your phone’s Settings menu to add the Tile, the Tile app (Android, iOS) handles everything. You just launch the app, tap a button to add a new Tile, and press firmly on the Tile’s center button when prompted.

In the app, you can name each Tile whatever you like and also add a photo. For example, if you have a Tile Mate in your backpack, you can add a photo of the backpack for that particular Tile. You can view your devices—all Tiles, your paired phone, and any other phones and tablets running the Tile app under your account—in list or map modes. You can pair an unlimited number of Tiles with a phone, but only eight (on iOS) or four Tiles (on Android) can be actively communicating (via Bluetooth) with the phone at once.

Flaws but not dealbreakers

The Tile Mate lacks geofencing features (to let you know when you’ve left a tracked item behind), unless you pay for Tile Premium. Even then, we’ve found its performance to vary widely: One Wirecutter staffer who uses this feature regularly receives notifications within a few blocks of leaving home, but another doesn’t get notices until he’s nearly 10 minutes away.

Also great: Tile Slim (2020) and Tile Sticker (2020)

Tile Bluetooth tracker

Photo: Michael Murtaugh

If you’ve bought into the Tile ecosystem, you may want to tag more of your stuff than just your keys. The Tile Slim (2020) and Tile Sticker (2020) use the same technology as the Tile Mate, but in different styles that can be useful in a variety of situations.

Tile Bluetooth tracker

The Tile Slim is designed to slide into your wallet. Photo: Michael Murtaugh

Tile Slim is Tile’s hardware designed for your wallet. It’s in the shape of a credit card, and, at 2.4 millimeters, it’s as thick as three of them. Despite its thin size, the Tile Slim has the expected button for ringing your phone and a speaker. It’s the quietest Tile of the 2020 lineup, but at 99.5 dB in our testing, it’s still surprisingly loud (about as loud as a lawn mower or a motorcycle engine). The speaker is cleverly located toward the top of the card when it’s held either vertically or horizontally, allowing it to stick out above a card pocket so that the sound isn’t blocked. We measured the Tile Slim’s range at 144.4 feet, compared to the promised 150 feet, so it’s pretty much spot-on.

Tile Bluetooth tracker

The Slim is about the same size as a typical credit card, though it’s a little thicker. Photo: Michael Murtaugh

Tile Sticker is a brand new design, and it’s the smallest Tile yet. Sold in packs of two or four, Tile Sticker is roughly the size of four quarters stacked, and the small round tracker sticks with adhesive to whatever you want to track. This makes the Sticker a good option for anything that doesn’t have a keyring or tether, and because this tracker is so small, it can be attached discreetly. At 103.9 dB, the Tile Sticker’s speaker is almost as loud as the Tile Mate’s, and it’s cleverly hidden in the Tile logo’s “l.” We measured a shorter-than-advertised 120.2-foot range, but that’s within striking distance of the 150 feet that Tile claims and still pretty impressive for something so small.

image 7

The Tile Sticker is a small tracker that can adhere to any surface. Photo: Michael Murtaugh

Unfortunately, neither the Tile Slim nor the Tile Sticker uses a replaceable battery, though Tile says the battery will last for three years. The upside is that since they’re sealed, both the Slim and Sticker models are rated IPX7, meaning they can withstand being submerged in water up to a meter deep. When they run out of juice, you can order replacements at a lower cost through the reTile program. Each Tile you own can be replaced at a 30 percent to 40 percent discount, though you’re responsible for recycling the old one yourself—and you can take advantage of the discount only once a year, no matter how many Tiles you want to replace.

How Tile trackers work

Regardless of which Tile you’re using, once a Tile is paired with your phone, you can use the accessory in a few different ways. If you lose track of a Tile-equipped item that’s still in Bluetooth range, you can see its current location on a map in the app and optionally trigger the Tile’s alarm to help you locate the item by sound.

When you designate a Tile as lost in the app, this activates Tile’s Community Find feature to help you find it. This feature takes advantage of any device that has the Tile app installed: If one of those phones or tablets passes within Bluetooth range of your lost tracker, you’ll get an alert on your phone and an email with the location where it was detected. This all happens in the background, invisibly—the person running the app will have no idea where your stuff is, or even that they’ve helped you locate a specific item. This feature worked as advertised in our testing; over the several years we’ve been testing Tile trackers, I’ve received a handful of notifications that I’ve helped someone locate something.

You can also use a Tile to find your phone—if it’s within Bluetooth range. Double-pressing the Tile’s button triggers a tune to play on your phone at full volume, even if the volume is otherwise turned down or the phone is set to vibrate. And if your phone or tablet is not nearby, you can use Tile’s Web service to find linked phones or tablets in any Web browser. The service is very similar to Apple’s Find My tool: It displays your devices on a map, and if one is lost, you can ring it or display a message on its lock screen. We consider this a nice extra, but it’s a shame you can’t also use the website to locate the actual Tile trackers, as you can in the app. You can also use Amazon Alexa or Google Home to find your Tile-connected devices or call for them using Siri Shortcuts on iOS 12 or later.

The Tiles are the only Bluetooth trackers we encountered with an Apple Watch app that shows connected trackers on a map and lets you trigger alarms. This isn’t a huge advantage, but it’s a nice bonus. And Tile is also building out its platform, incorporating its tracking technology into third-party devices. Examples include the KeySmart Pro, a key holder, and Bose SoundSport headphones. Because the Tile platform doesn’t require special hardware, just firmware on a standard Bluetooth chip, the company hopes to greatly expand its partnerships.

The Tile app does need to be running on your phone for it to connect to the trackers, but we’ve found that it stays active in the background, even when you haven’t opened it in quite some time. The app will stop running only if you actively quit it, and even then, the app will send a notification that it needs to be running to track your stuff.

If you’re concerned about the privacy implications of using a Bluetooth tracker, Tile has told us that the company uses your phone’s location data in four ways: determining where you are in relation to your stuff, periodically determining the location of each tracker, noting your location if you’re in range of someone else’s lost tracker, and (if you contact Tile’s support staff) determining the approximate location of your computer or device by IP address. We don’t think any of these uses is particularly invasive for a device that you’re purchasing to locate you and your stuff.

The competition

Tile Pro (2020) is a more expensive and slightly larger version of the tracker, with a longer range. Tile says this model will stay connected for up to 400 feet, or 40 feet longer than the length of a football field. In our tests, the Tile Pro remained connected for the entire, 190-foot length of our office and remained connected. Though a longer range is better, we think that in almost any scenario around the home or office, the Tile Mate will be sufficient. And if your house is longer than 400 feet, you can swing the extra $10 for the Tile Pro.

You may still be able to find the 2018 versions of the Tile Mate and Tile Pro at discounted rates. They have shorter ranges than the 2020 models, but if finding range isn’t your primary concern, these versions work just as well. We would recommend sticking to the current Tile Slim as opposed to the 2016 edition, though, because the newer one fits better in a wallet and has a longer-lasting battery.

Orbit offers a number of tracker styles, including the Orbit Glasses tracker, which fits on eyeglasses or sunglasses, and the Orbit Card, a card-style tracker that’s even thinner than the Tile Slim. These models are intriguing if you need tracking for those specific designs, but unfortunately, the network is just too limited for us to recommend choosing Orbit over Tile. Anecdotally, I lost a pair of sunglasses that were outfitted with Orbit Glasses in busy and tech-heavy New York City. And despite marking them as lost in the app in hopes of an Orbit user passing by and finding them, I never received a notice that the sunglasses were found by another Orbit user. Additionally, I wasn’t notified when the Orbit Card was running low on battery, which could potentially lead to a lost wallet with no way to find it.

TrackR’s Pixel is noticeably smaller than the Tile Mate. Measuring just about an inch in diameter, it’s about the size of a modern dollar coin, and it’s as thick as a stack of three quarters. In head-to-head tests in June 2017, the TrackR Pixel averaged distances of 45.1 feet before disconnecting, shorter than the numbers for any of the Tile models. The TrackR’s shorter range, combined with the Tile’s larger network, keeps us from recommending the TrackR Pixel.

The Chipolo Plus is an impressively good clone of the 2015 Tile (which is no longer available). It’s shaped like a circle rather than a rounded rectangle, but it’s exactly the same thickness, height, and width as that Tile. Like the older Mate, the Chipolo Plus has a non-removable battery, a mail-in upgrade program, and an app that looks a heck of a lot like Tile’s. The Chipolo Plus worked well in our tests, but its ranges and alarm volume were comparable with those of the second-generation Tile Mate, which was quieter than current models. Chipolo also has fewer users than Tile, making its crowd-finding system less robust. Unlike Tile, though, Chipolo’s Web service allows you to see the location of each tracker, and your phone or tablet, from any Web browser.

The Pebblebee Honey has some great attributes, at least at first glance. Its battery is replaceable, and this model has a crowd-finding feature. Unfortunately, when you press the tracker’s button to trigger an alert on a missing phone, it sends a silent text alert, rather than playing an audible tone. A message popping up on the screen doesn’t do much good when you’re looking for the phone itself.

Cube offers three designs of its tracker, Cube, Cube Pro, and Cube Shadow, in a slim, wallet-able size. Though the Cube Shadow promises the same range as the Tile Slim, the Cube and Cube Pro offer half the range as the Tile Mate and Tile Pro, respectively, and the whole family has a smaller crowd-finding network than Tile.

Samsung’s SmartThings Tracker is different from the rest in that it uses a cellular LTE connection and GPS to report its location, rather than just relying on Bluetooth. That means it has a longer range than any Bluetooth tracker because there doesn’t have to be a direct connection, but it has a far shorter battery life and a much higher price. We’ll be testing this model and a few others for an upcoming guide to LTE-based trackers.

This guide may have been updated by Wirecutter. To see the current recommendation, please go here.

When readers choose to buy Wirecutter’s independently chosen editorial picks, Wirecutter and Engadget may earn affiliate commissions.

[ad_2]

Source link

Apple will engrave emoji on your AirPods case for free

[ad_1]

Apple is expanding the free engraving options on AirPods cases to include emoji. The selection is fairly limited, ranging from a few faces (such as my personal favorite, the grimace) through to heart and star symbols. You can also have a ghost, robot, alien, skull, hand gesture (but no middle finger) or an animal emoji adorning your AirPods case.

[ad_2]

Source link