Blog

What cooking gadgets can I bring to college?

[ad_1]

Nicole Lee

Nicole Lee
Senior Editor

From looking around online, it looks like the list of permissible gadgets differs pretty widely from institution to institution. Some prohibit any cooking gadgets, while some forbid items with exposed heating elements (meaning, a hotplate would be a no-go).

At a glance, it looks like UC Berkeley doesn’t allow any electric cooking devices except for a microwave. Stanford doesn’t allow toasters, but does allow toaster ovens. MIT won’t even allow a Keurig coffee maker in a dorm room. TL;DR, It’s more likely than not that you won’t be allowed to bring many kitchen electronics (if any) for safety regulations but it doesn’t hurt to check your university or college’s website. Some colleges offer apartments instead of dorms which have more lenient rules.

However, when it comes to things you could consider there are a handful of simple devices that can provide some pretty versatile options. You can go a long way with a mini fridge, a microwave, an electric kettle and/or a personal blender. Think: hardboiled eggs, smoothies, oatmeal, pasta. There are plenty of recipes online for quick and healthy dorm meals that can be made using a single device, but it also helps to think about meals that require more prep or assembly and less actual cooking. Things like antipasto spreads, hummus platters with pita and veggies, or sandwiches. It’ll at least offer some respite from all those ramen nights you’re likely to have.

[ad_2]

Source link

E3 data breach leaks info for thousands of registered journalists

[ad_1]

Thanks to a staggering bit of negligence on the part of the organization that manages E3, the last and worst “leak” this year affects people from the media who covered the event. As pointed out on YouTube by Sophia Narwitz, a spreadsheet was available on the E3 website listing detailed contact information for over 2,000 journalists, content creators, analysts and others who applied for and received credentials to the event this year.

The list apparently existed so that videogame companies could reach news media and content creators they wanted to contact about coverage, but it’s obviously not intended to become publicly available. In a statement, the ESA said “Once notified, we immediately took steps to protect that data and shut down the site, which is no longer available. We regret this this occurrence and have put measures in place to ensure it will not occur again.”

That doesn’t do much to help the people who are now at risk for targeted harassment, and, as VentureBeat points out, may cause an issue with Europe’s GDPR. Narwitz noted that the list was pulled within hours of the ESA being notified, which was not soon enough to avoid people downloading and spreading the information.

ESA:

ESA was made aware of a website vulnerability that led to the contact list of registered journalists attending E3 being made public. Once notified, we immediately took steps to protect that data and shut down the site, which is no longer available. We regret this this occurrence and have put measures in place to ensure it will not occur again.

[ad_2]

Source link

Amazon’s new opt-out keeps people from ‘reviewing’ your Alexa recordings

[ad_1]

Over the last few days Google and Apple have begun to address their use of real people that listen in on recordings to help improve voice AI like Assistant and Siri. For Amazon, these revelations surfaced months ago, and now it’s added a toggle that people can use to opt out of potentially having their voice recordings and/or recorded message transcripts “manually reviewed” by people.

While Amazon has said that only a small sample of recordings are manually reviewed, people may not want to have someone listening in on what they were saying just because their speaker or remote thought it heard the wake word.

Bloomberg reported first on the new setting, which users can find on the Amazon website or in Alexa apps under the Alexa Privacy section. A new Privacy Hub for Alexa arrived in May, at the same time Amazon added the option to delete your voice history with a voice command. A spokesperson told the outlet that “We’ll also be updating information we provide to customers to make our practices more clear.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Apple Card customer agreement: use two-factor, no jailbreaking

[ad_1]

As the debut of Apple’s “new kind of credit card” draws closer, partner Goldman Sachs has published the official customer agreement (PDF) on its website. The Apple Card terms are pretty standard — similar to some other cards, purchasing any kind of “cash equivalent” like cryptocurrency is prohibited — but there are some specific items.

[ad_2]

Source link

Evo founder confirms Riot is working on a new fighting game

[ad_1]

Cannon referred to Riot’s upcoming fighting game as “the worst-kept secret” in the universe. He said during the EVO livestream, “Back in 2016 when we joined forces with Riot I said that we were going to go in the hole for a while. I want to be able to let people in on maybe the worst kept secret in the universe which is that I can confirm we are working on a fighting game for Riot.”

Riot acquired Radiant Entertainment in 2016, a studio formed by Cannon and his twin brother that was behind the online fighting game Rising Thunder. Radiant is staffed by many prominent figures in the fighting game community, and many expected Riot’s next title to be a fighting game.

While Cannon didn’t reveal any further details about the game, he did mention that it would strive to have broad appeal. “So, the reason why we did Rising Thunder in the first place is that we felt that fighting games needed to be enjoyed by way more people. Like as big as things are, we think it has the potential to get bigger,” said Cannon.

Watch Evo 2019 – Day 1! from evo on www.twitch.tv

[ad_2]

Source link

Best Buy’s weekend sale includes up to $500 off 12-inch MacBooks

[ad_1]

Best Buy’s three-day weekend sale includes a bunch of discounts on Apple and Amazon products, as well as cuts on laptops, TVs, smartwatches and smart home products. The sale runs through Sunday, and if you’ve been waiting to buy a new device, it’s worth checking out.

[ad_2]

Source link

Lyft acknowledges its response to sexual harassment has fallen short

[ad_1]

“We are always exploring ways to improve the experience for all users, and this includes how we monitor and respond to allegations of misconduct to ensure that our users are supported,” a Lyft spokeswoman told The Washington Post. The spokeswoman reportedly admitted that, at times, the company’s response has fallen short.

Several women shared their stories with The Washington Post. One said a driver asked for her number, and not wanting to escalate the situation, she gave it to him. She later reported the incident to Lyft. The company allegedly responded that she had every right not to give her number out, but the fact that she did limited the consequences on the driver. Another woman reported jumping out of a car when the driver veered off course and wouldn’t stop. Lyft did ban the driver, but it still charged her for the ride. In some cases, Lyft allegedly offered not to pair a rider with a specific driver but did not ban the driver.

The fact that Lyft tries to appear like a safe, friendly alternative to Uber (it is pink, after all), makes things that much worse. Users told The Washington Post that Lyft’s app makes it harder to report harassment than Uber’s app. Though, Lyft claims that if a ride gets fewer than four stars, the company follows up and monitors responses for allegations of harassment or assault. And while Uber added a panic button more than a year ago, Lyft hasn’t released its promised equivalent. Lyft did add recurring background checks but did so nearly a year after Uber.

In March, Lyft announced “Lyft Profiles,” a feature that lets riders and drivers share interests and possibly spark conversation. Uber, on the other hand, added a Quiet Mode to signal to drivers when a passenger doesn’t want to chat. Both features have their flaws. What they prove is that ridesharing apps are still trying to figure out the passenger-driver dynamic and both have different approaches.

[ad_2]

Source link

Tesla rolls out fix for Dog Mode overheating bug

[ad_1]

There’s clearly a publicity element to the rapid turnaround for the fix. It both softens the blow of the initial flaw and makes Tesla look that much better by delivering a solution so quickly. At the same time, this does make a case for over-the-air car updates. In conventional cars, you might have to wait ages for a fix or visit a dealership — now, quicker patches like these can deploy within hours.

[ad_2]

Source link

Facebook defends decision not to ban fake news from politicians

[ad_1]

“I understand that your preference would be for Facebook to remove all content that you believe constitutes misinformation – which in this instance mean all content that discussed whether or not Labor intends to introduce a death tax – rather than demote it; however Facebook only removes content that violates our community standards,” wrote Milner. The executive insisted that the company had invested significantly in the Australian government’s efforts to “safeguard” the 2019 federal election.

Opponents of Australia’s Labor Party played a part in spreading fake news about the party’s tax policy. Back in January, Liberal treasurer Josh Frydenberg published a media release that falsely claimed that the Labor Party was going to impose a death tax. Minor political parties such as Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party worked to amplify the messaging on social media. The Guardian found that Australia’s Liberal party posted about 200 videos and made more than 600 posts that circulated the fake death tax news. Individual MPs also paid for ads that echoed the misinformation.

Since the aftermath of Brexit and the 2016 US presidential elections, Facebook has faced scrutiny over how it treats the fake political information that spread on its platform. The social media giant has vowed to crack down on fake news, taking steps such as banning foreigners from buying campaign ads. The platform partnered with third-party fact checkers around the world to vet photos, videos and articles. Facebook has traditionally taken the position that it will “demote” or down-rank fake news or misinformation, rather than remove it completely.

Prior to the election, the Labor Party reached out to Facebook multiple times in an effort to stop the fake death tax campaign. In the letter, Milner went on state that Facebook demoted the fake news on death taxes after its independent fact checkers found it to be false. But in the case of wrong information circulated by actual politicians, Facebook turned a blind eye. The platform’s policy is not to fact check any posts from political parties or politicians. “We do not agree that is is our role to remove content that one side of a political debate considers to be false,” Milner wrote.

[ad_2]

Source link