<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>at&amp;t 5g e &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/att-5g-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Study claims AT&#038;T&#8217;s fake 5G is slower than other carrier&#8217;s regular 4G</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/study-claims-atts-fake-5g-is-slower-than-other-carriers-regular-4g/</link>
					<comments>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/study-claims-atts-fake-5g-is-slower-than-other-carriers-regular-4g/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[4g lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5g e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t 5g e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/study-claims-atts-fake-5g-is-slower-than-other-carriers-regular-4g/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] AT&#38;T promises in its marketing materials that its 5G E service is a &#8220;first step on the road to 5G&#8221; and can offer &#8220;up to up to 2x faster than standard LTE.&#8221; However, the speed tests from OpenSignal seems to indicate that isn&#8217;t the case. The company collected data from 5G E capable phones [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>AT&amp;T promises in its <a href="https://www.att.com/5g/consumer/5g-evolution">marketing materials</a> that its 5G E service is a &#8220;first step on the road to 5G&#8221; and can offer &#8220;up to up to 2x faster than standard LTE.&#8221; However, the speed tests from OpenSignal seems to indicate that isn&#8217;t the case. The company collected data from 5G E capable phones on AT&amp;T&#8217;s recently rolled-out 5G E network to smartphone users getting standard 4G LTE services from other carriers. While it found AT&amp;T was providing solid speeds, an average of 28.8Mbps download rates, it offered no discernible difference when compared to most LTE networks. T-Mobile achieved download speeds of 29.4Mbps, while Verizon users averaged 29.9Mbps.</p>
<p>In a statement provided to Engadget, AT&amp;T contends that OpenSignal&#8217;s study is inaccurate. &#8220;OpenSignal&#8217;s note reveals their methodology is flawed,&#8221; a spokesperson for AT&amp;T said. &#8220;Speed test data purporting to show the &#8216;real-world experience of 5G Evolution&#8217; without verifying the capable devices were tested in a 5G Evolution coverage area as shown by the indicator does not accurately represent the 5G Evolution user experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>AT&amp;T has been all in on the 5G E network despite criticism. The company has introduced a <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/07/att-faux-5g-icon-rolls-out/">5G E indicator</a> for smartphones on its network and opened up the pseudo-5G service in <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/04/20/att-5g-evolution-new-markets/">more than 100 locations</a> so far. Competing carriers have <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/08/verizon-t-mobile-burn-att-fake-5g/">taken shots at the company</a> over the service, and Sprint has gone so far as to <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/02/08/att-5g-sprint-lawsuit/">sue over the branding</a>.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/03/22/opensignal-study-att-5g-e-speeds/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/study-claims-atts-fake-5g-is-slower-than-other-carriers-regular-4g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
