<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>booster &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/booster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SpaceX lost another Falcon booster to the sea</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/spacex-lost-another-falcon-booster-to-the-sea/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[booster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falcon 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of course i still love you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/spacex-lost-another-falcon-booster-to-the-sea/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] The booster was expected to land on a drone ship, called Of Course I Still Love You, approximately eight minutes and 24 seconds after launch. Instead, the booster made a &#8220;soft landing&#8221; in the ocean next to the ship. Falcon 9 B1056.4 has missed the drone ship. pic.twitter.com/259Yh545uy — Chris B &#8211; NSF (@NASASpaceflight) [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>The booster was expected to land on a drone ship, called Of Course I Still Love You, approximately eight minutes and 24 seconds after launch. Instead, the booster made a &#8220;soft landing&#8221; in the ocean next to the ship.</p>
<p><center></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Falcon 9 B1056.4 has missed the drone ship. <a href="https://t.co/259Yh545uy">pic.twitter.com/259Yh545uy</a></p>
<p>— Chris B &#8211; NSF (@NASASpaceflight) <a href="https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1229424297384587265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2020</a></p></blockquote>
<p></center></p>
<p>SpaceX has gotten pretty good at landing and reusing its boosters, but this isn&#8217;t the first time it&#8217;s lost one to the sea. In 2018, a core booster <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/02/06/spacex-falcon-heavy-center-core-lost/">plummeted straight into the ocean</a>. Last April, the company managed to <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/11/falcon-heavy-successfully-lifts-off-for-the-second-time/">land three Falcon Heavy boosters</a>, but the core booster, which landed on Of Course I Still Love You, <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/16/spacex-loses-falcon-heavy-center-booster/">fell off the drone ship</a> on its way back to land. Then, in June 2019, two side boosters landed successfully in Cape Canaveral, but the center core booster <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/06/24/stp-2-falcon-heavy-spacex/">missed the ship by a few feet</a>.</p>
<p>Still, the booster used this morning broke a SpaceX record for fastest turnaround. Prior to today&#8217;s mission, the booster launched just 63 days ago on December 16th. The company&#8217;s previous record for booster reuse was a 72-day turnaround of a Block 4 booster used to launch the TESS and CRS-15 missions for NASA in 2018. As SpaceX <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/16/spacex-30-000-starlink-satellites/">ramps up its Starlink constellation deployment</a>, it will try to reduce its booster turnaround time even more.</p>
</p></div>
<p><script async src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
<br />[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2020/02/17/spacex-falcon-booster-sea/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Major broadcasters sue nonprofit TV service over copyright infringement</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/major-broadcasters-sue-nonprofit-tv-service-over-copyright-infringement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[av]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dish network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbcu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbcuniversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tomorrow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/major-broadcasters-sue-nonprofit-tv-service-over-copyright-infringement/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] The lawsuit also alleges that Locast exists to help AT&#38;T and Dish avoid paying to carry broadcast content. Both DirectTV and Dish customers are directed to Locast on their set-top box menus. The lawsuit claims that when Locast retransmits signals, the broadcasters lose out on vital viewership information. In its defense, Locast says its [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>The lawsuit also alleges that Locast exists to help AT&amp;T and Dish avoid paying to carry broadcast content. Both DirectTV and Dish customers are directed to Locast on their set-top box menus. The lawsuit claims that when Locast retransmits signals, the broadcasters lose out on vital viewership information.</p>
<p>In its defense, Locast says its nonprofit status allows it to operate as a &#8220;booster&#8221; and strengthen a TV station&#8217;s signal to reach antennas. But as <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> points out, the fees broadcasters receive from pay TV distributors have become crucial to their survival. If Locast continues to grow, it could put a significant dent in the networks&#8217; revenue. Launched in 2018, the service already reaches 35 million homes in 13 cities &#8212; an estimated 31 percent of the market.</p>
<p>This case may remind you of another. In 2014, <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2014/04/22/aereo-supreme-court-explained/">broadcasters accused Aereo</a> of copyright infringement. Aereo charged customers $8 per month to rent a physical antenna that offered local channels and cloud DVR service streamed to smartphones, tablets and computers. But broadcasters and the federal government claimed that was a violation of copyright law, as re-broadcasting content from the airwaves via the internet is not allowed. In the end, Aereo was forced to <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2015/04/21/aereo-broadcasters-copyright-settlement/">pay broadcasters $950,000</a>. It&#8217;s too soon to guess whether Locast will face a similar fate.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/31/cbs-abc-nbc-fox-sue-locast-copyright-infringement/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
