<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>clarence thomas &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/clarence-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Clarence Thomas laments ruling that let FCC kill net neutrality</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/clarence-thomas-laments-ruling-that-let-fcc-kill-net-neutrality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[clarence thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/clarence-thomas-laments-ruling-that-let-fcc-kill-net-neutrality/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Of course, stating a change of opinion doesn&#8217;t negate the ruling by itself. There would need to be another case that reversed Brand X, and the chances of that happening aren&#8217;t terribly high. Mozilla still has the option of appealing to the Supreme Court after it lost its bid to overturn Pai&#8217;s net neutrality [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>Of course, stating a change of opinion doesn&#8217;t negate the ruling by itself.  There would need to be another case that reversed <em>Brand X</em>, and the chances of that happening aren&#8217;t terribly high.  Mozilla still has the option of appealing to the Supreme Court after it <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2020-02-07-net-neutrality-us-appeals-court.html">lost its bid</a> to overturn Pai&#8217;s net neutrality repeal, but that doesn&#8217;t mean other justices will see things his way.  Thomas might face an uphill battle rallying support in a court that&#8217;s primarily aligned with the current White House.  That&#8217;s also assuming he would be consistent when called to act &#8212; another case could produce different results.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2020/02/26/clarence-thomas-regrets-net-neutrality-ruling/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
