<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jd power &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/jd-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Tesla trails the pack in its first JD Power car quality study</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/tesla-trails-the-pack-in-its-first-jd-power-car-quality-study/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jd power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tesla-trails-the-pack-in-its-first-jd-power-car-quality-study/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Tesla has appeared in a JD Power Initial Quality Study for the first time, and it doesn’t look good for the electric car maker — although the story is more complex than it sounds. JD Power ranked Tesla last out of 32 brands operating in the US, with 250 problems per 100 vehicles. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>Tesla has <a href="https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2020-initial-quality-study-iqs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">appeared</a> in a JD Power Initial Quality Study for the first time, and it doesn’t look good for the electric car maker — although the story is more complex than it sounds. JD Power ranked Tesla last out of 32 brands operating in the US, with 250 problems per 100 vehicles. The top brands, Dodge and Kia, had ‘just’ 136 problems. Tesla wasn’t officially participating in the study as it doesn’t grant permission to survey owners in 15 states where it’s required, but JD Power collected enough surveys (about 1,250) from other states to produce a score.</p>
<p>That’s not a sterling result, but the numbers don’t say everything. JD Power automotive president Doug Betts <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/24/tesla-lags-auto-industry-in-quality-finds-new-jd-power-study.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">told <em>CNBC</em></a> that Tesla’s issues were mostly related to production-related issues like body panel gaps, paint flaws and squeaks. For contrast, nearly a quarter of all automakers’ problems stemmed from infotainment issues like touchscreens, phone connectivity and built-in navigation. Tesla vehicles may have more issues, then, but they’re less likely to be ones that affect the basic functionality of the car.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/tesla-places-last-in-jd-power-reliability-study-182453352.html">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US networks improved in early 2019 with help from 5G upgrades</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/us-networks-improved-in-early-2019-with-help-from-5g-upgrades/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[5g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jd power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us cellular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/us-networks-improved-in-early-2019-with-help-from-5g-upgrades/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] The explanation could be a straightforward one. For the most part, carriers were in a rush to either launch their 5G networks or expand what little 5G service they had. That meant upgrading their infrastructure to handle 5G&#8217;s extra demands and improving quality for everyone, whether it was call quality or download speeds. This [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>The explanation could be a straightforward one.  For the most part, carriers were in a rush to either <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/30/sprint-5g-live-in-four-cities/">launch their 5G networks</a> or expand <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/04/verizon-5g-network-testing-chicago-data-speeds/">what little 5G service they had</a>.  That meant upgrading their infrastructure to handle 5G&#8217;s extra demands and improving quality for everyone, whether it was call quality or download speeds.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t let providers off the hook.  Even the seven percent figure still amounts to a lot of frustrated customers, and there are bound to be areas where a carrier has poorer-than-usual coverage.  Nonetheless, it&#8217;s a positive sign &#8212; let&#8217;s just hope that there isn&#8217;t a repeat of what happened with LTE, where the initially blistering networks bogged down as capacity failed to keep up with demand.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/18/jd-power-wireless-quality-1st-half-2019/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
