South Korea appears to be the hardest hit country, suffering at least 10 attacks. India was the victim of three attacks, with Bangladesh and Chile the victim of two each. Meanwhile, Costa Rica, Gambia, Guatemala, Kuwait, Liberia, Malaysia, Malta, Nigeria, Poland, Slovenia, South Africa, Tunisia and Vietnam suffered one attack each.

The attacks were undertaken in three main ways: through the SWIFT system used to transfer money between banks; directly through exchanges and users to steal cryptocurrency; and by “cryptojacking” computers by infecting them with malware to use its resources to generate cryptocurrency.

In one unnamed country, for example, hackers managed to access the infrastructure managing its entire ATM system and installed malware modifying the way transactions are processed. In another country, stolen funds were “transferred through at least 5,000 separate transactions and further routed to multiple countries before eventual conversion” to a currency that a government has declared legal money, therefore making it extremely difficult to track the funds.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange, Bithumb, has been targeted at least four times. Two attacks in 2017 resulted in losses of around $7 million each, while a further two, in June 2018 and March 2019, lead to the loss of $31 million and $20 million respectively.

According to the report, many of these attacks are undertaken by actors operating under the direction of the Reconnaissance General Bureau — the General Bureau is North Korea’s military intelligence agency. The UN says that the attacks, which are “low risk and high yield” and often require little more than a laptop and internet access, are being investigated as attempts to violate UN sanctions.

According to Phys.org, the structure in question is on Enewetak atoll in the Marshall Islands — where the US conducted 67 nuclear weapons tests between 1946 and 1958. The tests included the Castle Bravo hydrogen bomb, which was reportedly about 1,000 times bigger than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In the late 70s, waste from those tests was dumped into a crater and capped with a concrete dome 18 inches thick. That was intended to be a temporary solution, so the bottom of the crater was never lined.

Now, UN Secretary General António Guterres and Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine fear nuclear waste could be leaking from the pit. They’re also concerned about cracks in the concrete, which they worry could break apart if hit by a tropical cyclone. Guterres says the Pacific’s nuclear history needs to be addressed — hopefully he’ll be taken more seriously than Shin Godzilla‘s Goro Maki, who warned of impending trouble but went unheard.

As the nuclear apocalypse looms over popular culture and consciousness, acclaimed fantasy author Neil Gaiman is preparing to launch Good Omens, a six-episode Amazon Prime series based on the 1990 novel he wrote in partnership with Terry Pratchett. Good Omens doesn’t imagine an Earth ravaged by nukes, but instead sees it scheduled for destruction by immutable demonic forces. The apocalypse is inevitable and ineffable, but that doesn’t stop a group of informed folks from trying to thwart it anyway, much as we’re doing in reality.

“Somebody sent me a message on Twitter yesterday asking how I managed to cunningly set up the time frame of this so incredibly well, so that at the exact point that Good Omens came out would be a point where Armageddon would actually feel real and possible,” Gaiman told Engadget at SXSW. “There was a line that Terry and I put into the book when we wrote it … about how unlikely an apocalypse was at that time when everybody was getting along so incredibly well. I, frankly, given the choice, would much rather have had to put that line into the show.”

Good Omens is proof of humanity’s obsession with The End. It closely follows the entities that hold the fate of the planet in their hands, riffing on humanity’s history of atomic warmongering and militaristic posturing. It’s a story built on the idea that people have the power to end the world. And to save it.

“One of the things that I love about Good Omens is that it is life-affirming and world-affirming,” Gaiman said. “It actually suggests very strongly that the avoidance of war is a much more important thing than war.”

The chances of a nuclear catastrophe, accidental or purposeful, increase exponentially with each warhead in existence. However, the weapons themselves aren’t the actual problem — the fact that we know how to make them is. US scientists released the nuclear-knowledge genie in 1945 and there’s no going back; we’ve reached a point where no country’s leader will believe another when they promise to destroy their stockpiles.

In this case, mistrust is the harbinger of Armageddon, not nuclear warheads.

Here’s where Good Omens really drives the lesson home. The story revolves around the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley, two creatures from opposing sides of an ageless and endless war. They live on Earth for eons and, once the devil’s plan becomes clear, they work together to save humankind from annihilation. The message isn’t about dismantling nuclear warheads, but breaking down the barriers preventing us from seeing our common ground.

“It’s a very nice message, too, when you have the two central characters, these celestial beings, they don’t have any really dog in the fight, other than the fact that they’ve been around long enough and hung around humanity enough that they kind of like it,” said Jon Hamm, who plays the archangel Gabriel on Amazon’s version of Good Omens. “And they realize that what we’ve done down here is actually sort of a lovely thing and they’d rather not burn it all down. I feel the same way. I’d rather not burn it all down.”

“Me too,” Gaiman responded. “I really like it.”

Good Omens replaces military leaders with gods and demons, and a nuclear Armageddon with fated doom, but the stakes are just as high. Atomic weapons technology is the sole property of humankind; we’ve constructed the means to our own end and duplicated it thousands of times over. With nuclear bombs, humans have the ultimate, fabled power of god or the devil.

Of course, we also have the power to not destroy the world.

“You can not slice any part of Good Omens through without hitting it, just the idea that actually the world is a really good thing,” Gaiman said. “It’s a really good place and sticking around on it is infinitely preferable to any way of ending it or damaging it that proves a point. … That, in many ways, is the biggest challenge. How do you make the averting of an apocalypse as dramatically interesting as an apocalypse?”

Gaiman, at least, has a theory.