<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>patent dispute &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/patent-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>HTC stops selling phones in UK while patent dispute rumbles on</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/htc-stops-selling-phones-in-uk-while-patent-dispute-rumbles-on/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentdispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentinfringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/htc-stops-selling-phones-in-uk-while-patent-dispute-rumbles-on/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] It&#8217;s long been tussling with an R&#38;D company named Ipcom over intellectual property, particularly regarding wireless tech developed for car phones. HTC agreed to only sell phones that used a workaround in the UK. However, according to the BBC, Ipcom claimed HTC hadn&#8217;t put that workaround in place, based on tests it ran earlier [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>It&#8217;s long <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ipcom-to-enforce-injunction-against-htc-ban-sales-of-its-3g-dev/">been tussling</a> with an R&amp;D company named Ipcom over intellectual property, particularly regarding wireless tech developed for car phones. HTC agreed to only sell phones that used a workaround in the UK. However, <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49239277">according to</a> the <em>BBC</em>, Ipcom claimed HTC hadn&#8217;t put that workaround in place, based on tests it ran earlier this year. It accused HTC of having &#8220;disregard for the law by contravening a UK court ruling.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As a leading innovator, HTC takes intellectual property issues very seriously,&#8221; an HTC spokeswoman told the <em>BBC</em>. &#8220;We are proactively investigating an infringement claim by a third party with respect to a single handset model.&#8221;</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/05/htc-uk-phone-sales-patent-dispute/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury decides Apple violated three Qualcomm patents in iPhones</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/jury-decides-apple-violated-three-qualcomm-patents-in-iphones/</link>
					<comments>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/jury-decides-apple-violated-three-qualcomm-patents-in-iphones/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/jury-decides-apple-violated-three-qualcomm-patents-in-iphones/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Qualcomm filed suit over the issue in 2017. The patents relate to allowing phones to quickly connect to the internet after they&#8217;re switched on; battery efficiency and graphics processing; and a traffic management function that allows apps to download data faster. According to CNET, Apple argued an engineer named Arjuna Siva made vital contributions [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>Qualcomm filed suit over the issue in 2017. The patents relate to allowing phones to quickly connect to the internet after they&#8217;re switched on; battery efficiency and graphics processing; and a traffic management function that allows apps to download data faster.</p>
<p>According to <em>CNET,</em> Apple <a href="https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-qualcomm-patent-infringement-verdict/">argued</a> an engineer named Arjuna Siva made vital contributions to the boot-up technology while working for the company and should have been named on that patent. However, Siva (now a Google employee) ultimately opted not to testify at the San Diego trial, and the jury struck down Apple&#8217;s argument.</p>
<p>Apple also claimed the lawsuit was in fact an act of retaliation by Qualcomm for Apple adding Intel as another chip supplier <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/16/iphone-7-teardown-intel-inside/">in 2016</a>. Qualcomm had been Apple&#8217;s exclusive supplier since 2011 &#8212; Intel&#8217;s components have now replaced Qualcomm&#8217;s in iPhones.</p>
<p>The ruling arrived ahead of a bigger legal fight between the two companies over royalty payments. A trial in that case has been <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/01/apple-and-qualcomm-in-court-april-15th/">scheduled for next month,</a> also in San Diego, with billions of dollars at stake. The result of another trial involving the parties, <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/05/ftc-begins-antitrust-trial-against-qualcomm/">which took place in January,</a> is pending. Apple, Intel and the Federal Trade Commission have accused Qualcomm of having a monopoly over modems in phones.</p>
<p>The tussle between Qualcomm and Apple has played out in other countries too. Qualcomm won an injunction against Apple in Germany in December, which <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/20/apple-iphone-ban-germany-qualcomm/">banned</a> the sale of some older iPhones in the country. Apple later <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/02/14/apple-concedes-qualcomm-german-iphone-ban/">started selling</a> iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 in Germany again after swapping out Intel modems for Qualcomm&#8217;s there.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/03/15/apple-qualcomm-patent-lawsuit-jury-ruling/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/jury-decides-apple-violated-three-qualcomm-patents-in-iphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
