<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>radeon 5700 &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/radeon-5700/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>AMD brings the fight back to NVIDIA</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/amd-brings-the-fight-back-to-nvidia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[av]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalcomputing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon 5700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon 5700 xt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cards]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/amd-brings-the-fight-back-to-nvidia/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] What matters most, of course, is what&#8217;s under the hood: AMD&#8217;s RDNA architecture, previously known to enthusiasts as &#8220;Navi.&#8221; The Radeon 5700 and 5700 XT are built on a 7 nanometer process, which makes them more efficient than the 14nm Vega. This isn&#8217;t a first for AMD &#8212; the beefy Radeon VII, which remains [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>What matters most, of course, is what&#8217;s under the hood: AMD&#8217;s RDNA architecture, previously known to enthusiasts as &#8220;Navi.&#8221; The Radeon 5700 and 5700 XT are built on a 7 nanometer process, which makes them more efficient than the 14nm Vega. This isn&#8217;t a first for AMD &#8212; the beefy Radeon VII, which remains its high-end option, is also a 7nm card, but one built on its older &#8220;Graphics Core Next&#8221; (GCN) platform.</p>
<p>The real benefits for the Radeon 5700 and 5700 XT come from AMD&#8217;s revamped computing unit design, as well as a higher bandwidth and lower latency memory. Most important is the more efficient graphics pipeline, which the company says will allow for better performance per clock, in addition to higher speeds. AMD claims that an RDNA card will be about 50 percent faster than a GCN card with the same clock speed and power consumption.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:640px;">
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="row"/>
<th scope="col">Radeon RX 5700</th>
<th scope="col">Radeon RX 5700 XT</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Compute Units</th>
<td>36</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">TFLOPs</th>
<td>7.95</td>
<td>9.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Memory</th>
<td>8GB GDDR6</td>
<td>8GB GDDR6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Base Clock</th>
<td>1.47 GHz</td>
<td>1.6 GHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Game Clock</th>
<td>1.625 GHz</td>
<td>1.76 GHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Boost Clock</th>
<td>1.73 GHz</td>
<td>1.9 GHz</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Both new GPUs also support PCIe 4.0, which will offer twice the bandwidth of the PCIe 3.0 standard found on modern PCs. That should help to reduce load times in games with faster NVMe drives, If you&#8217;re excited about PCIe 4.0 though, just be aware that you&#8217;ll need to snag a new motherboard to take advantage of it. And at the moment, it&#8217;s only supported in AMD&#8217;s X570 chipset with third-generation Ryzen CPUs. Not surprisingly, Intel is trying to<a href="https://www.legitreviews.com/intel-shows-pci-express-4-0-means-nothing-for-gamers_212350"> downplay the importance of PCIe 4.0 today</a>, since the current standard can still handle 4K/144Hz displays without any issue. At the very least, AMD is showing that it&#8217;s new platform is future proof. Sony, for example is already touting incredibly fast load times for the next PlayStation, which will also run AMD&#8217;s RDNA hardware.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" alt="Radeon RX 5700" data-caption="Radeon RX 5700" data-credit="Engadget" data-credit-link-back="" data-dam-provider="Engadget" data-local-id="local-1-5141134-1562420718133" data-media-id="8328bad7-efa7-4c59-b5ea-d0b9d935920d" data-original-url="https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2019-07/28b4c2b0-9fb6-11e9-b3ff-1046fedafd30" data-title="Radeon RX 5700" src="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/AMD-brings-the-fight-back-to-NVIDIA.jpeg"/></p>
<p>The Radeon 5700 XT features 40 compute units, 2,560 stream processors and a boost clock speed of 1.9GHz. The 5700 is based on the exact same hardware, but it has four fewer compute units, 2,304 stream processors and tops out at 1.73GHz. Both cards include 8GB of GDDR6 RAM, instead of the HBM2 memory from AMD&#8217;s last few GPUs. Technically, HBM2 offers faster bandwidth, but AMD says the move to GDDR6 allows for more flexibility when designing GPUs. As for ports, both offer three DisplayPort connections and an HDMI port. The Radeon 5700 relies on a single 8-pin power connection, while the XT uses an 8+6 pin configuration.</p>
<p>So what are AMD&#8217;s new cards going up against? Originally, the company positioned the 5700 XT as something that could clobber NVIDIA&#8217;s RTX 2070, while the 5700 against the RTX 2060. In most cases, the new Radeons were noticeably faster. But now they&#8217;re competing with the speedier<a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/02/nvidia-rtx-super-2060-2070-2080-price-release-date-specs/"> RTX Super cards</a>, which makes things a bit more complicated.</p>
<h3>In use</h3>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:640px;">
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="row"/>
<th scope="col">3DMark Timespy/Timespy Extreme</th>
<th scope="col">Hitman 2</th>
<th scope="col">Destiny 2</th>
<th scope="col">Witcher 3</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Radeon 5700 XT</th>
<td>8,506/3,871</td>
<td>92 FPS</td>
<td>85-105 FPS</td>
<td>85-90 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Radeon 5700</th>
<td>5,510/2,545</td>
<td>79 FPS</td>
<td>75-90 FPS</td>
<td>75-80 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">RTX 2060 Super</th>
<td>8,574/4,015</td>
<td>83 FPS</td>
<td>93-110 FPS</td>
<td>86-90 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">RTX 2070 Super</th>
<td>9,706/4,474</td>
<td>95 FPS</td>
<td>120-140 FPS</td>
<td>90-105 FPS</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On a broad level, both new Radeon GPUs deliver excellent 1,440p performance. The XT, naturally, fares better when pumping up graphics settings &#8212; I saw between 85 and 105 frames per second in <em>Destiny 2</em>, compared to 75 to 90 FPS on the 5700. Most importantly, they&#8217;re both able to run that game beyond 60FPS without a sweat. But if you&#8217;re a discerning gamer with a 144Hz monitor, which can handle higher frame rates, then you&#8217;ll probably want to invest in the pricier XT.</p>
<p>I saw a similar bump in performance with <em>Hitman 2&#8217;s</em> benchmark. The Radeon 5700 XT reached an average of 92 FPS with all of the graphics settings dialed up, while the 5700 clocked in at 79 FPS. In 1080p, both cards performed about the same, but that&#8217;s not a huge surprise. At that resolution, your performance relies more on your CPU than the GPU.</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/07/radeon-rx-5700-xt-review/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD fires back at &#8216;Super&#8217; NVIDIA with Radeon 5700 price cuts</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/amd-fires-back-at-super-nvidia-with-radeon-5700-price-cuts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalcomputing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon 5700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/amd-fires-back-at-super-nvidia-with-radeon-5700-price-cuts/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] AMD just unveiled its new Radeon 5700 line of graphics cards with 7nm chips at E3 last month, and with just days to go before they launch on July 7th, the company has announced new pricing. In the &#8220;spirit&#8221; of competition that it says is &#8220;heating up&#8221; in the graphics market &#8212; specifically NVIDIA&#8217;s [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>AMD <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/06/10/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gpu/">just unveiled its new Radeon 5700 line of graphics cards with 7nm chips</a> at E3 last month, and with just days to go before they launch on July 7th, the company has <a href="https://twitter.com/Radeon/status/1147248833556099072" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">announced</a> new pricing. In the &#8220;spirit&#8221; of competition that it says is &#8220;heating up&#8221; in the graphics market &#8212; specifically NVIDIA&#8217;s <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/02/nvidia-rtx-super-2060-2070-2080-price-release-date-specs/">&#8220;Super&#8221; new RTX cards</a> &#8212; all three versions of the graphics card will be cheaper than we thought.</p>
<p>The standard Radeon 5700 with <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/26/amd-radeon-rx-5000-navi-gpus/">36 compute units</a> and speeds of up to 1.7GHz was originally announced at $379, but will instead hit shelves at $349 &#8212; the same price as NVIDIA&#8217;s RTX 2060. The 5700 XT card that brings 40 compute units and up to 1.9GHz speed will be $50 cheaper than expected, launching at $399. The same goes for the 50th Anniversary with a slightly higher boost speed and stylish gold trim that will cost $449 instead of $499.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s enough to keep them both cheaper than the $499 Super RTX 2070 &#8212; we&#8217;ll have to wait for the performance reviews to find out if it&#8217;s enough to make sure they&#8217;re still relevant.</p>
</p></div>
<p><script async src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
<br />[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/05/radeon-5700-price-cut/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
