<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>water resistant &#8211; EFR Technology Group</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.efrtechgroup.com/category/water-resistant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com</link>
	<description>We maintain technology so you don't have to!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Samsung under fire for its Australian advertising</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/samsung-under-fire-for-its-australian-advertising/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[accc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water resistant]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/samsung-under-fire-for-its-australian-advertising/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Despite what the marketing materials implied, Samsung phones can&#8217;t survive being submerged in anything other than fresh water. On the company&#8217;s website, it says that the Galaxy S10 series can resist dust and (fresh) water for 30 minutes at depths up to 1.5 meters. Of course, the small print on Samsung&#8217;s website did say [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>Despite what the marketing materials implied, Samsung phones can&#8217;t survive being submerged in anything other than fresh water. On the <a href="https://www.samsung.com/au/support/mobile-devices/water-and-dust-protection-ip68/">company&#8217;s website</a>, it says that the Galaxy S10 series can resist dust and (fresh) water for 30 minutes at depths up to 1.5 meters. Of course, the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/samsung-in-court-for-misleading-phone-water-resistance-advertisements">small print</a> on Samsung&#8217;s website did say that its Galaxy series phones are &#8220;not advised for beach or pool use.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) was particularly unimpressed because the issue of water resistance is a big selling point in Australia. A now-removed <a href="https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:V7SCkcU1cSsJ:https://www.samsung-reimagine.com.au/2017/04/04/water-resistance-changed-how-i-used-my-phone/">post on Samsung&#8217;s Australian website</a> said &#8220;Samsung Electronics Australia Vice President of IT and Mobile Richard Fink believes water resistance is something that &#8216;should come standard&#8217; on mobile phones released in the Australian market, given our lifestyles.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Samsung showed the Galaxy phones used in situations they shouldn&#8217;t be to attract customers,&#8221; Chair of the ACCC, Rod Sims, <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/samsung-in-court-for-misleading-phone-water-resistance-advertisements">said</a>. &#8220;Under the Australian Consumer Law, businesses cannot mislead consumers about their products&#8217; capabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>This comes on the heels of a rough period for Samsung, with the CEO admitting that he pushed the launch of the Galaxy Fold <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/01/samsung-koh-on-rushing-galaxy-fold/">before it was ready</a>, leading to a <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/15/how-samsung-may-fix-galaxy-fold-design/">host of design flaws</a>. The company is also being accused of deceptive advertising about its <a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/02/06/ethical-smartphone-conscious-consumption/">labor practices</a>. It is facing a <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8a7adbe0-9e19-11e9-9c06-a4640c9feebb">lawsuit in France</a> over reports that it employed under-age workers and that conditions in its Asian factories were abusive, despite claims on its <a href="https://www.samsung.com/uk/aboutsamsung/vision/philosophy/samsung-spirit/">website</a> that it adheres to &#8220;a strict global code of conduct to all employees&#8221; and that it practices &#8220;ethical management&#8230; [w]ith an aim to become one of the most ethical companies in the world.&#8221;</p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/04/samsung-lawsuit-australian-advertising/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OnePlus explains the 7&#8217;s lack of a water resistance rating</title>
		<link>https://www.efrtechgroup.com/tech/oneplus-explains-the-7s-lack-of-a-water-resistance-rating/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneplus 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneplus 7 pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water resistant]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.efrtechgroup.com/oneplus-explains-the-7s-lack-of-a-water-resistance-rating/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] An accompanying video also claimed that water resistance ratings &#8220;cost you money,&#8221; and showed a OnePlus 7 model being dunked in a bucket as &#8216;proof&#8217; of its ability to survive immersion. Pei didn&#8217;t rule out IP ratings in the future, and didn&#8217;t want customers to try submerging their own phones. Whether or not this [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [ad_1]<br />
</p>
<div>
<p>An accompanying video also claimed that water resistance ratings &#8220;cost you money,&#8221; and showed a OnePlus 7 model being dunked in a bucket as &#8216;proof&#8217; of its ability to survive immersion.</p>
<p>Pei didn&#8217;t rule out IP ratings in the future, and didn&#8217;t want customers to try submerging their own phones.</p>
<p>Whether or not this persuades anyone is another story. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily cost the <em>buyer</em> money to get an IP rating &#8212; it&#8217;s up to the company to decide how that cost affects profits. And IP ratings can be particularly important if you&#8217;re a fan of the outdoors. They give you an at-a-glance understanding of whether or not a phone will survive your excursions, helping you make informed purchases. Although the absence of an IP rating doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean a phone is fragile, it won&#8217;t be very reassuring.</p>
<p align="center"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2l7iiX5fHRc" width="640"></iframe></p>
</p></div>
<p>[ad_2]<br />
<br /><a href="https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/04/oneplus-on-7-water-resistance/">Source link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
