Match wasn’t letting paid subscribers receive emails from these shady accounts.

The FTC also accused Match of failing to properly disclose the hoops dateless users need to jump through to qualify for a free six-month subscription. Match also didn’t provide a simple way to cancel, officials said, and those that disputed charges through their banks found themselves banned.

As you might guess, Match disagreed with the FTC’s claims. In a statement, it said the agency “misrepresented” company emails and used “cherry-picked data” to make its assertions. Instead, the emails were the results of bots, spam and other perpetrators.

Whether or not that argument flies is another matter. The FTC’s argument isn’t so much that Match sent the messages intentionally as that it had different standards for spam based on whether or not you were a paid user. If regulators can show that Match was knowingly letting spammers slide, the company might be in just as much trouble as if it had sent those emails on purpose.